Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological Board, 307 N.W.2d 490.

59 citing documents.

MOAC Mall Holdings, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the Estate of Irvin John Cooper, Sr., Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(denying equitable relief when such relief would circumvent statutory restrictions); Kingery v. Kingery, 241 N.W.
Larry Walters, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
First and Third Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
U.S. Holdings, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
for the proposition that “equitable relief cannot be granted where the rights of the parties are governed by a valid contract.” We are not persuaded.
S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Katie Howard, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Zoological Bd., (“[E]quitable relief cannot be granted where the rights of 2 While nonprecedential opinions are not binding legal authority, we find Albrecht persuasive in the context of this case.
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Craig Scherber & Associates, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(denying equitable relief when it would circumvent statutory restrictions).
Travis Colsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
GGG, Incorporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(denying unjust enrichment claim because “equitable relief cannot be granted where the rights of the parties are governed by a valid contract”); Sterling Capital Advisors, Inc. 23 v. Herzog, (“The existence of an express contract between the parties preclu
Skyler Woodard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 490, 497 (Minn. 1981).
Streambend Properties II, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that if equitable relief were granted, statutory restrictions would be circumvented).
Carol Vanerka Stephens, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
see also Colangelo v. Norwest Mortg., Inc. , review denied (Minn. Oct.
Crow Wing Cooperative Power and Light Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Andrew Carufel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Production Stamping, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(holding that district court erred in not finding state to be in default because such conclusion would render meaningless significant portion of contract, including provision governing default); Morse v. Nagris, 185 Minn. 266, 268-69 , 240 N.W.
Robert Martin v. A�BULAE, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert Martin v. A�BULAE, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 490, 497 (Minn. 1981) (“[E]quitable relief cannot be granted where the rights of the parties are governed by a valid contract.”).
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Storms, Inc. v. Mathy Construction Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Storms, Inc. v. Mathy Construction Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Minn. 10 Zoological Bd.
Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Randy L. Brandt v. Wayne E. Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Langford Tool & Drill Co. v. The 401 Group, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., v. Minn. State Zoological Bd.
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Fieseler Masonry, Inc. v. City of Mabel, Exact Construction Company, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
v. Minn. State Zoological Bd., quoted with approval in Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
(stating that “equitable relief cannot be granted where the rights of the parties are governed by a valid contract”).
Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Soderbeck v. Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. 793 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Chojnacki 668 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Chojnacki 668 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(denying equitable relief when it would circumvent statutory restrictions).
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage Litigation 652 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Cady v. Bush, 283 Minn. 105, 110
Colangelo v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. 598 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Colangelo v. Norwest Mortgage, Inc. 598 N.W.2d 14 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Midwest Sports Marketing, Inc. v. Hillerich & Bradsby of Canada, Ltd. 552 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1996
ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc. 544 N.W.2d 302 Minn. 1996
Johnson v. Carlson 507 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1993
Johnson v. Carlson 507 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1993
(a state agency cannot incur contractual obligations unless funds have been appropriated for such purpose).
Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co. 493 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co. 493 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(if equitable relief were granted, statutory restrictions would be circumvented); Kingery v. Kingery, 185 Minn. 467, 470 , 241 N.W.
Holman v. CPT CORP. 457 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by