Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Housley, 322 N.W.2d 746.
-
In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. I. S., Child.
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-51 (Minn. 1982) (concluding that the state did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had no right to defend himself from plain-clothes officers who violently broke into his home to execute a warrant); (ordering a new trial when (1) the compl
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
First, in arguing for a “grave doubts” standard for reversal, Sledge cites four cases that use that phrase— specifically, —but he does not explain how those cases compare to his circumstances or how they support reversal of his convictions despite the presence of sufficient evide
- State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State v. Pendleton 567 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1997
- State v. Pendleton 567 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1997
- State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Auchampach
540 N.W.2d 808
Minn. 1995
8 -31 (1983) (holding that defendant has initial burden of production with respect to issue of duress for specific intent crime; the burden then shifts back to the state to show lack of duress, or its converse, specific intent, because duress negates element of specific intent); (noting that once defendant meets his initial burden of production with evidence sufficient to raise the issue of self-defense, the burden shifts to the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the killing was not j
- Sanford v. State 499 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
Sanford v. State
499 N.W.2d 496
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
This court held that Sanford’s
- State v. Sanford 450 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Sanford
450 N.W.2d 580
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Sanford argues, however, that his requested instructions 3 and 4
- State v. Fidel 451 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Fidel 451 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- City of St. Louis Park v. Berg 433 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1988
-
City of St. Louis Park v. Berg
433 N.W.2d 87
Minn. 1988
(jury verdict of assault on police officer reversed outright on appeal).
- State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
- State v. Buchanan 431 N.W.2d 542 Minn. 1988
- Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
- Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
- State v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Morrison 351 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1984
- State v. Morrison 351 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1984
- King v. State 353 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
King v. State
353 N.W.2d 144
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
We are not prompted by a review of the record to have “grave doubt” *148 as to the verdict, as defendant proposes, and find instead an abiding conviction as to the propriety of the conviction.
- State v. Roberts 350 N.W.2d 448 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Roberts
350 N.W.2d 448
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Although reversal on sufficiency of evidence is extraordinary action, it must occur when, as here, “we entertain such grave doubt as to defendant’s guilt” and where reversal is “in the interest of justice.”
- State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Liggons
348 N.W.2d 785
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
citing State v. Boyce, 284 Minn. 242, 254
- MacK v. City of Minneapolis 333 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1983
- MacK v. City of Minneapolis 333 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1983
- State v. Austin 332 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1983
- State v. Austin 332 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1983