Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Langeland v. Farmers State Bank of Trimont, 319 N.W.2d 26.

55 citing documents.

Emily Pedersen, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The Pedersens maintain that one of these circumstances, when the defendant’s negligence caused a “physical injury” that results in the plaintiff ’s emotional distress, applies here.
Mary Jane Gross, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Langeland v. Farmers State Bank , (stating the zone -of-danger standard applies “[i]n cases in which physical symptoms occur subsequent to and because of the plaintiff’s emotional disturbance”).
Misty Jensen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Historically, “the general rule regarding the negligent infliction of emotional distress has been that there can be no recovery absent some accompanying physical injury.” Langeland v. Farmers State Bank , (citing W. Prosser, Handbook of the Law of Torts § 54, at 328 -29 (4th ed. 1971)).
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 745 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 745 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 2008
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP 726 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
21, 1999); (determining that no attorney-client relationship existed under a tort theory in part because the plaintiffs did not deal directly with the attorney); (determining that no attorney-client relationship existed under a tort theory in part because th
Molloy v. Meier 660 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Molloy v. Meier 660 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
at 639 () (noting that appellants would not be able to assert a cause of action for the negligent infliction of emotional distress absent either physical injury or physical danger).
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Wall v. Fairview Hospital & Healthcare Services 584 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1998
Osborne v. Chapman 574 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1998
Osborne v. Chapman 574 N.W.2d 64 Minn. 1998
Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc. 573 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1998
Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc. 573 N.W.2d 356 Minn. 1998
Prior Lake State Bank v. Groth, 259 Minn. 495, 500 , Tarnowski v. Resop, 236 Minn. 33, 39-40 , Bergquist v. Kreidler, 158 Minn. 127, 130 , 196 N.W.
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Wall v. Fair View Hospital & Healthcare Services 568 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A. 556 N.W.2d 557 Minn. 1996
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 544 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1996
Richie v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 544 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1996
238 (Minn.1891), to support them argument.
K.A.C. v. Benson 527 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1995
K.A.C. v. Benson 527 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1995
Carlson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Carlson v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. 520 N.W.2d 534 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lee v. Metropolitan Airport Comm’n, -24 (Minn.App.1988).
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
McDonough v. City of Rosemount 503 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Carradine v. State 494 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Carradine v. State 494 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Silberstein v. Cordie 474 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Silberstein v. Cordie 474 N.W.2d 850 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(no cause of action for negligent infliction of emotional distress absent either physical injury or physical danger to plaintiff).
Markgraf v. Douglas Corp. 468 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Markgraf v. Douglas Corp. 468 N.W.2d 80 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Langeland v. Farmer’s State Bank of Tri-mont
TJD Dissolution Corp. v. Savoie Supply Co. 460 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
TJD Dissolution Corp. v. Savoie Supply Co. 460 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
979, 981 (1916)); -31 (Minn.1982) (duty of lawyer depends on the existence of attorney-client relationship).
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Schuler v. Meschke 435 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Veit v. Anderson 428 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Veit v. Anderson 428 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
An attorney-client relationship exists under the “tort theory” even in the absence of an express contract “whenever a person seeks and receives legal advice from a lawyer under circumstances in which a reasonable person would rely on the advice.” (citing Togstad, d at 693, n. 4 ); see Gerdin, d at 8 .
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tibbetts v. Crossroads, Inc. 411 N.W.2d 535 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gillespie v. Klun 406 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Gillespie v. Klun 406 N.W.2d 547 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Whitney v. Buttrick 376 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Whitney v. Buttrick 376 N.W.2d 274 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Gerdin v. Princeton State Bank 371 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Gerdin v. Princeton State Bank 371 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kostrzewski v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Kostrzewski v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. 364 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
New Concept Confinement Technology Feeders, Inc. v. Kuecker 364 N.W.2d 450 Minn. Ct. App. 1985