Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gartner v. Eikill, 319 N.W.2d 397.

23 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of Robert Estelle’s Termination of Section 8 Benefits. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
William Miller, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
But, absent fraud or misrepresentation, “a person who signs a contract may not avoid it on the ground that [s]he did not read it or thought its terms to be different.” d 397, 398 (Minn. 1982).
Shane A. Kennedy, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, e.g., Gartner v. Eikill , ( “In the 8 absence of fraud or misrepresentation, a p erson who signs a contract may not avoid it on the ground that he did not read it or thought its terms to be different.” ); Greer v. Kooiker, 312 Minn. 499, 508, (noting “a party to a contract .
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“In the absence of fraud or misrepresentation, a person who signs a contract may not avoid it on the ground that he did not read it or thought its terms to be different.” see Bus.
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 795 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 2011
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 795 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 2011
In general, “a court may order an agreement rescinded if both parties were mistaken with respect to facts material to the agreement.”
SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp. 779 N.W.2d 865 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Hy-Vee Food Stores, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Health 705 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 2005
Chalmers v. Kanawyer 544 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Chalmers v. Kanawyer 544 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
(-99 (Minn.1982); Restatement (Second) Contracts, § 152(1) (1981)).
D.J.'s Upholstery, Inc. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 505 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
D.J.'s Upholstery, Inc. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 505 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-99 (Minn.1982) (mutual mistake warrants rescission of contract).
Beasley v. Medin 479 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Beasley v. Medin 479 N.W.2d 95 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. City of St. Peter 433 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. City of St. Peter 433 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Winter v. Skoglund 404 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1987
Malecha v. St. Croix Valley Skydiving Club, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Malecha v. St. Croix Valley Skydiving Club, Inc. 392 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
“In the absence of fraud or misrepresentation, a person who signs a contract may not avoid it on the ground that he did not read it or thought its terms to be different.”
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski 347 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rudzinski 347 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1984