Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Evans, 311 N.W.2d 481.

209 citing documents.

  • State v. Walters 315 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Walters 315 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1982
    this would normally mean that the appropriate sentence here would be concurrent terms of 36 months, the 36 months being double the term of 18 months that the trial court could have imposed without departing.
  • State v. Rott 313 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Rott 313 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1981
    We reduce defendant’s sentence to 2 years, and affirm as modified.
  • State v. Erickson 313 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Erickson 313 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1981
    The Guidelines permit imposition of a consecutive sentence for the *19 fake imprisonment of the child in this case, and, since departure was justified for that offense, the presumptive sentence of 1 year and 1
  • State v. Barnes 313 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Stumm 312 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Stumm 312 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1981
    where the acts of the defendant, although far more reprehensible than those usually found in the offense of robbery, did not result in any permanent physical injury to the victim, we adopted a general upper departure limit of double the presumptive sentence and stated that “there may well be rare cases