Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Evans, 311 N.W.2d 481.
- State v. Walters 315 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Walters
315 N.W.2d 590
Minn. 1982
this would normally mean that the appropriate sentence here would be concurrent terms of 36 months, the 36 months being double the term of 18 months that the trial court could have imposed without departing.
- State v. Rott 313 N.W.2d 574 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Rott
313 N.W.2d 574
Minn. 1981
We reduce defendant’s sentence to 2 years, and affirm as modified.
- State v. Erickson 313 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Erickson
313 N.W.2d 16
Minn. 1981
The Guidelines permit imposition of a consecutive sentence for the *19 fake imprisonment of the child in this case, and, since departure was justified for that offense, the presumptive sentence of 1 year and 1
- State v. Barnes 313 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1981
- State v. Stumm 312 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Stumm
312 N.W.2d 248
Minn. 1981
where the acts of the defendant, although far more reprehensible than those usually found in the offense of robbery, did not result in any permanent physical injury to the victim, we adopted a general upper departure limit of double the presumptive sentence and stated that “there may well be rare cases