Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Miller v. Shugart, 316 N.W.2d 729.

175 citing documents.

BD. OF REGENTS OF U. OF M. v. Royal Ins. 503 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Board of Regents of University of Minnesota v. Royal Insurance Co. of America 503 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Board of Regents of University of Minnesota v. Royal Insurance Co. of America 503 N.W.2d 486 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Drake v. Ryan 498 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Drake v. Ryan 498 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 498 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 498 N.W.2d 289 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 497 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1993
Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. 497 N.W.2d 254 Minn. 1993
Vang v. Vang 490 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Vang v. Vang 490 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The agreement specifically provides the parties “kept in mind and have been guided by”
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Bob Useldinger & Sons, Inc. v. Hangsleben 483 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
the insured does not have an absolute right to protect the insured’s own financial interests.
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 481 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1992
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 481 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1992
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Luetmer 474 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. Luetmer 474 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
249 n. 3 (Minn.1982); , 733 & n. 3 (Minn. 1982); Prahm v. Rupp Constr.
Brownsdale Cooperative Ass'n v. Home Insurance Co. 473 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Brownsdale Cooperative Ass'n v. Home Insurance Co. 473 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Estate of Fournelle 472 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1991
American National Fire Insurance Co. v. Estate of Fournelle 472 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1991
(plaintiff claimant and insured defendant may stipulate to amount of money judgment before insurer’s declaratory judgment suit is decided).
Principal Financial Group v. Allstate Insurance Co. 472 N.W.2d 338 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co. 463 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1990
Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co. 463 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1990
S.G. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
S.G. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 460 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. D.H.L. 459 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1990
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. D.H.L. 459 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1990
and the claimant patient apparently entered into a so that, on this appeal, the patient alone appears as defendant-respondent.
Rivers v. Richard Schwartz/Neil Weber, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Rivers v. Richard Schwartz/Neil Weber, Inc. 459 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Peterson v. Brown 457 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Peterson v. Brown 457 N.W.2d 745 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
to insurance agents and agencies.
Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co. 451 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co. 451 N.W.2d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
to conclude that a jury trial is not required in such cases.
Ebenezer Society v. Dryvit Systems, Inc. 453 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Ebenezer Society v. Dryvit Systems, Inc. 453 N.W.2d 545 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Ebenezer and Dryvit entered into a purported Miller-Shugart agreement (), whereby Dryvit agreed to entry of a $1,000,000 judgment against it, and Ebenezer agreed that the judgment would be collected only from Dryvit’s insurers, not Dryvit.
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 448 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Short 448 N.W.2d 560 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In 1988, Keller and Steven entered a $997,500
Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson 445 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 448 N.W.2d 865 Minn. 1989
Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson 445 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1989
While the jury was deliberating, Iverson and Olson entered a settlement agreement, in the tort suit
Nichols v. Meilahn 444 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Distinguished Nichols v. Meilahn 444 N.W.2d 872 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
The trial court, in denying appellant’s motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint against respondent-garnishee insurers allegedly covering the owner, but not the driver, of the car which injured appellant, is distinguishable from that presented in the instant case.
Moose Club v. LaBounty 442 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191 442 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Steen v. Those Underwriters at Lloyds, London Signatory to Policy No. E0100191 442 N.W.2d 158 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hennings v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 438 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hennings v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 438 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
stated: Although having found that the stipulated judgment is untainted by fraud or collusion, our inquiry is not at an end.
Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by