Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Miller v. Shugart, 316 N.W.2d 729.

175 citing documents.

Runia v. Marguth Agency, Inc. 437 N.W.2d 45 Minn. 1989
St. Michel v. Burns and Wilcox, Ltd. 433 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
St. Michel v. Burns and Wilcox, Ltd. 433 N.W.2d 130 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
(plaintiff judgment creditor has the burden of proving the settlement is not fraudulent or unreasonable).
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 428 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. 428 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Prior to presentation of Baumann-Furrie’s defense case in the accounting malpractice action, the judgment creditors and Baumann-Furrie entered into a
Hartfiel v. McLennan 430 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Hartfiel v. McLennan 430 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson 426 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Economy Fire & Casualty Co. v. Iverson 426 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Traver v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 418 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Traver v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 418 N.W.2d 727 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kohler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 416 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kohler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 416 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Arnold contends an insurer cannot attack a settlement or stipulated judgment entered into by its insured when the insurer has abandoned the insured, leaving him to defend the action.
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Osgood v. Medical, Inc. 415 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ross v. City of Minneapolis 408 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ross v. City of Minneapolis 408 N.W.2d 910 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
On June 12,1985, Ross, the City, and the Club entered into a providing for entry of judgment in favor of Ross against the City and the Club for $500,000.00 (the amount of Bellefonte’s coverage), recoverable only against Bellefonte.
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morris 741 P.2d 246 Ariz. 1987
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 403 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1987
The issue of how much of the settlement is covered is distinct from the issue of whether a settlement is reasonable, , 734 *630 (Minn.1982).
Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Helme 735 P.2d 451 Ariz. 1987
Clemens v. Wilcox 392 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1986
Clemens v. Wilcox 392 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1986
249 n. 3 (Minn.1982); , *866 391 n. 2 (Minn.1979); , 888 n. 5 (1978).
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 386 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance/Continental Casualty Co. 386 N.W.2d 257 Minn. Ct. App. 1986

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by