Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., 322 N.W.2d 599.

168 citing documents.

Kay "KT" Jacobs v. City of Columbia Heights 9 N.W.3d 536 Minn. 2024
Kay "KT" Jacobs v. City of Columbia Heights 9 N.W.3d 536 Minn. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Les Grumdahl Window & Siding LLC, A Minnesota Limited Liability Company v. Holly Brown, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Advisers, Inc., (noting that neglect of the party itself is inexcusable and will not provide grounds to vacate a default judgment).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. R. B., Commissioner of Human Services, Legal … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Margaret Leuthard, Minn. 2021
Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
Nancy Leppink, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Advisers, Inc. , abrogated on other grounds by Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC, Thompson v. Barnes
In re the Matter of: David Allen Engh, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Advisers, Inc., 602 (Minn. 1982) (reversing order denying default judgment and remanding for entry of default judgment where district court abused its discretion by denying default judgment), abrogated on other grounds by Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson 889 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Gwender Lagrone Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gwender Lagrone Taylor v. Ian W. Taylor, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
As a general rule, “this court may consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.’” Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School Dist., (quoting Thayer v. Financial Advisers, Inc., ).
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse 878 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse 878 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2016
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, Respondent 876 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 2016
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, Appellant, v. Byron David SMITH, Appellant, Respondent 876 N.W.2d 310 Minn. 2016
Ride Auto Company, judgment creditor v. Luis Silva Ibanez, Judgment Debtor, Johnny's LLC, garnishees Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ride Auto Company, judgment creditor v. Luis Silva Ibanez, Judgment Debtor, Johnny's LLC, garnishees Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Advisors, Inc., see also Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28, 30
Jeremy Ray Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeremy Ray Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Advisers, Inc., (holding that an issue is not proper for consideration on appeal where the trial court did not have the opportunity to consider the issue), abrogated on other grounds by Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC
Steven Charles Lind v. William Guenther Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Steven Charles Lind v. William Guenther Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Advisers, Inc., (“Neglect of the parties themselves that leads to entry of default judgment is inexcusable neglect .
State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurray 860 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Ford McMurray 860 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2015
Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13 842 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13 842 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohde 820 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2012
Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. Rohde 820 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2012
Advisers, Inc., abrogated on other grounds by Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC, )); see also Oganov v. Am.
State v. Bailey 732 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2007
State v. Bailey 732 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2007
Lewis-Miller v. Ross 710 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2006
Lewis-Miller v. Ross 710 N.W.2d 565 Minn. 2006
(“A reviewing court must generally consider ‘only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.’ ” (quoting Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., )).
State v. Palubicki 700 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2005
State v. Palubicki 700 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2005
Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC. 669 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 2003
Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC. 669 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 2003
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
Advisers, Inc., (indicating that a reviewing court is limited to considering only those issues presented and considered by the district court).
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 632 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 2001
State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur 590 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1999
State Ex Rel. Morrow v. LaFleur 590 N.W.2d 787 Minn. 1999
see also Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., (reviewing court will consider "only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it”).
State v. Williams 568 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
State v. Williams 568 N.W.2d 885 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Advisers, Inc., (holding appellate court may only consider issues presented to or considered by trial court); (declining review of constitutional question not raised at trial court level).
Reese v. Brookdale Motors, Inc. 567 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1997