Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 328 N.W.2d 736.

57 citing documents.

Michael Walton Hinton v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Michael Walton Hinton v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
11 See State v. Jones , (finding multiple grounds for departure, including failure to render aid, when defendant participated in aggravated robbery of an elderly lady and left injured victim in apartment).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Parker 901 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2017
State v. Parker 901 N.W.2d 917 Minn. 2017
invades the zone of privacy that surrounds the victim’s home.” (emphasis added)); (“The robbery occurred in the victim’s home and therefore involved invading the zone of privacy that surrounds the victim’s home.” (emphasis added)).
Ahmed Shire Ali v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ahmed Shire Ali v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Turrubiates 830 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Turrubiates 830 N.W.2d 173 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
See, -38 (Minn.1983) (finding multiple grounds for departure when defendant participated in aggravated robbery of elderly victim and then left injured, helpless victim alone in victim’s apartment); (“[B]e-cause of the absolute vulnerability of the victim and the particul
Tucker v. State 799 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 2011
Tucker v. State 799 N.W.2d 583 Minn. 2011
3 See, (finding multiple grounds for departure when defendant participated in the aggravated robbery of an elderly victim and then left the injured, helpless victim secluded in victim’s apartment); (finding multiple grounds for departure when defendant, while b
State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Robideau 783 N.W.2d 390 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Although failure to obtain medical care for the victim may in some situations justify a departure based on particularly cruelty, (holding that beating and leaving an elderly man in critical condition without calling an ambulance supported particular cruelty finding to enhance robbery sentence); (holding that failure to obtain aid for the victim was particularly cruel in an un
Tucker v. State 777 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Tucker v. State 777 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Jones 745 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 2008
State v. Jones 745 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 2008
State v. Weaver 733 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Weaver 733 N.W.2d 793 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See, -68 (Minn.App.1987), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State v. Leja 684 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 2004
State v. Behl 547 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Behl 547 N.W.2d 382 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Chao Yang 533 N.W.2d 81 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Harwell 515 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Harwell 515 N.W.2d 105 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
(leaving the victim without calling for medical help is particularly cruel); Strommen, d at 544-45 (same).
State v. Pearson 479 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Pearson 479 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
(failure to seek medical attention for assault victim); Stumm, d at 249 (indifference towards caring for two-year-old assault victim).
State v. Frank 416 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Frank 416 N.W.2d 744 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Brinston 415 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Brinston 415 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
1 (1986), a person is criminally liable for the criminal acts of another “if the person intentionally aids, advises, hires, counsels or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime.” the Minnesota Supreme Court upheld an upward durational departure.
State v. Watts 413 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Watts 413 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Graham 410 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Graham 410 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
(1) (1986), provides that “[a] person is criminally liable for a crime committed by another if the person intentionally aids, advises, hires, counsels, or conspires with or otherwise procures the other to commit the crime.” Accordingly, the supreme court held that upward departures were justified although the defendants were merely passive participants in the crimes.
State v. Harris 407 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Harris 407 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Sturm 391 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sturm 391 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(prolonged beating and stamping on victim’s head and body is particularly cruel); (repeated stabbing with a butter knife is particularly cruel); (stabbing someone 23 times is particularly cruel); (leaving the victim in a beaten condition is particularly cruel).
State v. Bottomley 384 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Bottomley 384 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Eberhardt 379 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sirek 374 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Sirek 374 N.W.2d 481 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Campbell 367 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1985
State v. Campbell 367 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1985
State v. Winchell 363 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 1985