Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Jones, 328 N.W.2d 736.
-
State v. Winchell
363 N.W.2d 747
Minn. 1985
(trial court departed durationally from presumptive sentence for a felony murder in sentencing man who went on shooting spree that resulted in death of woman who was on her porch when struck; since invasion of victim’s residential privacy was not element of offense of felony murder, it was proper for court to rely on it in departing); (robbery occurring in victim’s house); (kidnapping of child from child’s yard); (sexual assault case involving invasion of zone of privacy surrounding and includin
- State v. Pince 358 N.W.2d 435 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Pince
358 N.W.2d 435
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See, d at 120 ; at 39 (Minn.1984) (a remand was necessary because the trial court’s intent was not clear).
- State v. Pickett 358 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Pickett
358 N.W.2d 38
Minn. 1984
2 the court affirmed the 333-month term rather than remand to let the trial court decide if it wished to impose that term after being told that it was a departure.
- State v. Pickett 343 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Pickett
343 N.W.2d 670
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
authorizes the court to approve an unintentional limited departure where there are aggravating circumstances.