Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kraft, 326 N.W.2d 840.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Gavin Patrick Meany Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
He cites one relevant opinion:
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
sentencing court’s exercise of discretion, as long as the record shows the sentencing court carefully evaluated all the testimony and information presented before making a determinati on.” However, appellate courts “have the power, if the circumstances warrant, to modify a sentence given by the [district] court, even if the sentence is within the presumptive sentence range.” d 840, 842 (Minn. 1982) .
- State of Minnesota v. Michael Jon Underland Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Michael Jon Underland
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We retain the power, however, to modify a sentence within the presumptive range “if the circumstances warrant.”
- State v. McLAUGHLIN AND SCHULZ, INC. 397 N.W.2d 9 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. McLAUGHLIN AND SCHULZ, INC.
397 N.W.2d 9
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(medical evidence sufficient to require modification of presumptive sentence for defendant whose leukemia was in remission).
- State v. Andren 347 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
State v. Andren
347 N.W.2d 846
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
(refusal to make, dispositional departure and place defendant on probation); -8 (Minn.1981); (refusal to make dispo-sitional departure and place defendant on probation).
- State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
- State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
- State v. Moore 340 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 1983
- State v. Abeyta 336 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1983
- State v. Abeyta 336 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 1983
- State v. Hines 330 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1983
- State v. Hines 330 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1983
- State v. Bentley 329 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1983
-
State v. Bentley
329 N.W.2d 39
Minn. 1983
However, we stated that although “we do not intend entirely to close the door on appeals from refusals to depart * * * * we believe that it would be a rare case which would warrant reversal of the refusal to depart.”
- State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982
- State v. Freyer 328 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1982
- State v. Freyer 328 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1982
- State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982