Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Stufflebean, 329 N.W.2d 314.
- Tsipouras v. State 567 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Barlow 541 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Barlow
541 N.W.2d 309
Minn. 1995
More recently, the defendant, acting pro se, moved prior to the commencement of voir dire for dismissal of two members of the jury panel who were employed by a corporation owned in large part by the victim’s family and whose president was the victim’s father.
- State v. Ford 539 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1995
- State v. Ford 539 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1995
- State v. Logan 535 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Logan
535 N.W.2d 320
Minn. 1995
-18 (Minn.1983), suggested that in an appeal based on juror bias, the appellant must show not only that the challenged juror was subject to challenge for cause but also that actual prejudice resulted from the failure to dismiss the juror in response to the defendant’s objection.
- State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
- State v. Roan 532 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1995
- State v. Washington 521 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1994
- State v. Washington 521 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1994
- State v. Drieman 457 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Drieman
457 N.W.2d 703
Minn. 1990
“In an appeal based on juror bias, an appellant must show that the challenged juror was subject to challenge for cause, that actual prejudice resulted from the failure to dismiss, and that appropriate objection was made by appellant.”
- State v. Williams 451 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
State v. Williams
451 N.W.2d 886
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Human perception is not infallible and “[tjhis is especially true when the testimony goes to the particulars of a traumatic and extremely stressful incident.” (citations omitted).
- State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Mosby 450 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
- State v. Larson 447 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- State v. Larson 447 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- State v. Scruggs 421 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1988
- State v. Scruggs 421 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1988
- State v. Bobo 414 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Bobo 414 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Alladin 408 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Alladin 408 N.W.2d 642 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- State v. Reed 398 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Reed 398 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
- Alholm v. Wilt 394 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1986
- State v. Casady 392 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Casady 392 N.W.2d 629 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Powe v. State 389 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Powe v. State
389 N.W.2d 215
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Guevara, 270 Minn. 356, 362
- In Re the Welfare of D.L.K. 381 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1986
- In Re the Welfare of D.L.K. 381 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1986
- State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blais 379 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Blais 379 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Smith 376 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Smith
376 N.W.2d 537
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
‘They are a sign of the fallibility of human perception — not proof that false testimony was given at trial.’ (quoting State v. Hanson, 286 Minn. 317, 335 , ).
- State v. Huseth 375 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Huseth 375 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Coleman 373 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1985
- State v. Coleman 373 N.W.2d 777 Minn. 1985
- State v. McGath 370 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1985
-
State v. McGath
370 N.W.2d 882
Minn. 1985
(juror employed by closely held corporation owned in large part by victim’s family); City of St.
- State v. King 367 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. King 367 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1985