Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Stufflebean, 329 N.W.2d 314.
-
State v. Daniels
361 N.W.2d 819
Minn. 1985
(victim's testimony, considered as a whole, *827 found consistent).
- State v. Propotnik 355 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Propotnik 355 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Rose 353 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Rose 353 N.W.2d 565 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- State v. Dulak 348 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Dulak
348 N.W.2d 342
Minn. 1984
(a) “In an appeal based on juror bias, an appellant must show that the challenged juror was subject to challenge for cause, that actual prejudice resulted from the failure to dismiss, and that appropriate objection was made by appellant.” In this case defendant challenged certain jurors for cause on the