Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dean v. Goddard, 56 N.W. 1060.
- Court of A ppeals Chutich, J. St. Paul Park Refining Co. LLC, Respondent, vs. Minn. 2020
-
John Aydt, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Which uses establish actual use will depend on the purpose for which the land “may be ordinarily fit and adapted, and reasonably used.” Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 299, 56 N.W.
- Ebenhoh v. Hodgman 642 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
-
Ebenhoh v. Hodgman
642 N.W.2d 104
Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 293-94 , 56 N.W.
- LeeJoice v. Harris 404 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
LeeJoice v. Harris
404 N.W.2d 4
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 293-94 , 56 N.W.
- Ehle v. Prosser 197 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1972
-
Ehle v. Prosser
197 N.W.2d 458
Minn. 1972
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , McArthur v. Clark, 86 Minn. 165 , Ross v. Cale, 94 Minn. 513 , Fredericksen v. Henke, 167 Minn. 356 , , 46 A. L. R. 785 (1926); Mellenthin v. Brantman, 211 Minn. 336
- Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
-
Konantz v. Stein
167 N.W.2d 1
Minn. 1969
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
- Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
-
Dozier v. Krmpotich
35 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 1949
Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; City of St.
- Romans v. Nadler 14 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1944
-
Romans v. Nadler
14 N.W.2d 482
Minn. 1944
Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
- Skala v. Lindbeck 214 N.W. 271 Minn. 1927
-
Skala v. Lindbeck
214 N.W. 271
Minn. 1927
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 296 , .
- Fredericksen v. Henke 209 N.W. 257 Minn. 1926
-
Fredericksen v. Henke
209 N.W. 257
Minn. 1926
Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 , ; Brown v. Kohout, 61 Minn. 113 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Glover v. Sage, 87 Minn. 526 , .
- Rupley v. Fraser 156 N.W. 350 Minn. 1916
-
Rupley v. Fraser
156 N.W. 350
Minn. 1916
Possession to be adverse must be “actual, open, continuous, hostile, exclusive and accompanied by an intention to claim adversely.” Sherin v. Brackett, 36 Minn. 152 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 297 , .
- Gaston v. May 138 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1912
-
Gaston v. May
138 N.W. 1025
Minn. 1912
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462 , ; Holmgren v. Isaacson, 104 Minn. 84 , .
- Mattson v. Warner 132 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1911
-
Mattson v. Warner
132 N.W. 1127
Minn. 1911
Of the Cases decided by this court, relied on by plaintiff, Village of Glencoe v. Wadsworth, 48 Minn. 402 , , Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 , , Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , , Brown v. Kohout, 61 Minn. 113 , , and Sawbridge v. City of Fergus Falls, 101 Minn. 378 , , were all cases where the question was whether the evidence supported a decision that the possession was adverse, not whether a contrary finding was clearly and manifestly against the
- McCauley v. Town of McCauleyville 127 N.W. 190 Minn. 1910
-
McCauley v. Town of McCauleyville
127 N.W. 190
Minn. 1910
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462, 465 , .
- Holmgren v. Isaacson 116 N.W. 205 Minn. 1908
-
Holmgren v. Isaacson
116 N.W. 205
Minn. 1908
See Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 ; ; Dean v. Goddard, *86 55 Minn. 290 , ; Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462 , ; Dunnell (Minn.) Pr.
- Ross v. Cale 103 N.W. 561 Minn. 1905
-
Ross v. Cale
103 N.W. 561
Minn. 1905
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Sage v. Rudnick, 67 Minn. 362 , .
- Maas v. Burdetzke 101 N.W. 182 Minn. 1904
-
Maas v. Burdetzke
101 N.W. 182
Minn. 1904
See Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 296 , .
- Johnson v. Peterson 97 N.W. 384 Minn. 1903
-
Johnson v. Peterson
97 N.W. 384
Minn. 1903
See also Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Mitchell v. Chisholm, 57 Minn. 148 , ; Thompson v. Ellenz, 58 Minn. 301 , .
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Abner Townsend 86 N.W. 1007 Minn. 1901
-
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Abner Townsend
86 N.W. 1007
Minn. 1901
We have held that it is the latter in Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
- Todd v. Weed 86 N.W. 756 Minn. 1901
-
Todd v. Weed
86 N.W. 756
Minn. 1901
The payment of taxes was made a prominent item of evidence on this subject in the case of Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , , and in Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462 .
- Wheeler v. Gorman 83 N.W. 442 Minn. 1900
-
Wheeler v. Gorman
83 N.W. 442
Minn. 1900
Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
- Swan v. Munch 67 N.W. 1022 Minn. 1896
-
Swan v. Munch
67 N.W. 1022
Minn. 1896
In the case of Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 291 , , this court held: “The intent to claim by adverse possession may be inferred from the nature of the occupancy, and the possessory acts necessary to constitute adverse possession depend upon the character of the property, its location, and the purposes for which it is ordinarily fit or adapted.
- McRoberts v. McArthur 64 N.W. 903 Minn. 1895
-
McRoberts v. McArthur
64 N.W. 903
Minn. 1895
The essential ingredients necessary to create title by adverse possession are these: “The possession must be actual, open, continuous, hostile, exclusive, and accompanied by an intention to claim adversely.” Sherin v. Brackett, 36 Minn. 152 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .