Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dean v. Goddard, 56 N.W. 1060.

44 citing documents.

  • Court of A ppeals Chutich, J. St. Paul Park Refining Co. LLC, Respondent, vs. Minn. 2020
  • John Aydt, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    Which uses establish actual use will depend on the purpose for which the land “may be ordinarily fit and adapted, and reasonably used.” Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 299, 56 N.W.
  • Ebenhoh v. Hodgman 642 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • Ebenhoh v. Hodgman 642 N.W.2d 104 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 293-94 , 56 N.W.
  • LeeJoice v. Harris 404 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • LeeJoice v. Harris 404 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 293-94 , 56 N.W.
  • Ehle v. Prosser 197 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1972
  • Ehle v. Prosser 197 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1972
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , McArthur v. Clark, 86 Minn. 165 , Ross v. Cale, 94 Minn. 513 , Fredericksen v. Henke, 167 Minn. 356 , , 46 A. L. R. 785 (1926); Mellenthin v. Brantman, 211 Minn. 336
  • Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
  • Konantz v. Stein 167 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1969
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
  • Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
  • Dozier v. Krmpotich 35 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 1949
    Skala v. Lindbeck, 171 Minn. 410 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; City of St.
  • Romans v. Nadler 14 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1944
  • Romans v. Nadler 14 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1944
    Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
  • Skala v. Lindbeck 214 N.W. 271 Minn. 1927
  • Skala v. Lindbeck 214 N.W. 271 Minn. 1927
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 296 , .
  • Fredericksen v. Henke 209 N.W. 257 Minn. 1926
  • Fredericksen v. Henke 209 N.W. 257 Minn. 1926
    Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 , ; Brown v. Kohout, 61 Minn. 113 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Glover v. Sage, 87 Minn. 526 , .
  • Rupley v. Fraser 156 N.W. 350 Minn. 1916
  • Rupley v. Fraser 156 N.W. 350 Minn. 1916
    Possession to be adverse must be “actual, open, continuous, hostile, exclusive and accompanied by an intention to claim adversely.” Sherin v. Brackett, 36 Minn. 152 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 297 , .
  • Gaston v. May 138 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1912
  • Gaston v. May 138 N.W. 1025 Minn. 1912
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462 , ; Holmgren v. Isaacson, 104 Minn. 84 , .
  • Mattson v. Warner 132 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1911
  • Mattson v. Warner 132 N.W. 1127 Minn. 1911
    Of the Cases decided by this court, relied on by plaintiff, Village of Glencoe v. Wadsworth, 48 Minn. 402 , , Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 , , Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , , Brown v. Kohout, 61 Minn. 113 , , and Sawbridge v. City of Fergus Falls, 101 Minn. 378 , , were all cases where the question was whether the evidence supported a decision that the possession was adverse, not whether a contrary finding was clearly and manifestly against the
  • McCauley v. Town of McCauleyville 127 N.W. 190 Minn. 1910
  • McCauley v. Town of McCauleyville 127 N.W. 190 Minn. 1910
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462, 465 , .
  • Holmgren v. Isaacson 116 N.W. 205 Minn. 1908
  • Holmgren v. Isaacson 116 N.W. 205 Minn. 1908
    See Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 ; ; Dean v. Goddard, *86 55 Minn. 290 , ; Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462 , ; Dunnell (Minn.) Pr.
  • Ross v. Cale 103 N.W. 561 Minn. 1905
  • Ross v. Cale 103 N.W. 561 Minn. 1905
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Sage v. Rudnick, 67 Minn. 362 , .
  • Maas v. Burdetzke 101 N.W. 182 Minn. 1904
  • Maas v. Burdetzke 101 N.W. 182 Minn. 1904
    See Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 296 , .
  • Johnson v. Peterson 97 N.W. 384 Minn. 1903
  • Johnson v. Peterson 97 N.W. 384 Minn. 1903
    See also Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , ; Mitchell v. Chisholm, 57 Minn. 148 , ; Thompson v. Ellenz, 58 Minn. 301 , .
  • Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Abner Townsend 86 N.W. 1007 Minn. 1901
  • Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Abner Townsend 86 N.W. 1007 Minn. 1901
    We have held that it is the latter in Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
  • Todd v. Weed 86 N.W. 756 Minn. 1901
  • Todd v. Weed 86 N.W. 756 Minn. 1901
    The payment of taxes was made a prominent item of evidence on this subject in the case of Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , , and in Wheeler v. Gorman, 80 Minn. 462 .
  • Wheeler v. Gorman 83 N.W. 442 Minn. 1900
  • Wheeler v. Gorman 83 N.W. 442 Minn. 1900
    Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .
  • Swan v. Munch 67 N.W. 1022 Minn. 1896
  • Swan v. Munch 67 N.W. 1022 Minn. 1896
    In the case of Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290, 291 , , this court held: “The intent to claim by adverse possession may be inferred from the nature of the occupancy, and the possessory acts necessary to constitute adverse possession depend upon the character of the property, its location, and the purposes for which it is ordinarily fit or adapted.
  • McRoberts v. McArthur 64 N.W. 903 Minn. 1895
  • McRoberts v. McArthur 64 N.W. 903 Minn. 1895
    The essential ingredients necessary to create title by adverse possession are these: “The possession must be actual, open, continuous, hostile, exclusive, and accompanied by an intention to claim adversely.” Sherin v. Brackett, 36 Minn. 152 , ; Dean v. Goddard, 55 Minn. 290 , .