Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lussier v. State, 821 N.W.2d 581.

227 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] defendant may not withdraw his plea ‘if the record contains sufficient evidence to support the conviction.’” (quoting Raleigh, d at 94).
Ravy Nov v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ravy Nov v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We will reverse a decision of [the] postconviction court only if that court abused its discretion.” (alteration in original) (quotation and citation omitted).
John Mark Hentges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
John Mark Hentges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
When this court reviews the postconviction order, “we examine only whether the postconviction court’s findings are supported by sufficient evidence.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Bernard Zuckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Bernard Zuckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellant argued to the district court, and maintains on appeal, that his plea was invalid because it was inaccurate.1 “To be accurate, a plea must be established on a proper factual basis.” (quotations omitted).
Justin Stephen Ries v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Justin Stephen Ries v. State of Minnesota 889 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
4 postconviction court’s findings are supported by sufficient evidence.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S.L.S., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patrick Samuel Meszaros v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Mark Musburger v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Philip Lee Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Philip Lee Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Our supreme court has held that a “plea petition and colloquy may be supplemented by other evidence to establish the factual basis for a plea.” d 581, 589 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Wolhowe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jesse Lee Paskey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scotty William Polchow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Baron Montero Jones v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scotty William Polchow Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 581, 588 (Minn. 2012) (Lussier I).
State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Wolhowe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But the supreme court has clarified that it has “never required that the factual basis for the plea appear in the plea hearing 5 transcript verbatim.”
Jesse Lee Paskey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
“To be accurate, a plea must be established on a proper factual basis.” Id.
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jeffrey Edward Morey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “even if a district court does not elicit proper responses, a defendant may not withdraw his plea if the record contains sufficient evidence to support the conviction.” 5 (quotations omitted) (stating that “the plea petition and colloquy may be supplemented by other evidence to establish the factual basis for a plea”).
Mark Oran Schorn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Oran Schorn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jerry Delaney, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jerry Delaney, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tylynne Lashawn Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 581, 588 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Pov Beng Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Pov Beng Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Semaj Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Timothy Poorker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Semaj Williams v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“When reviewing a postconviction court’s decision, we examine only whether the postconviction court’s findings are supported by sufficient evidence.” 3 (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Timothy Poorker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
made violated the person’s rights under the Constitution or laws of the United States or of the state”); d 581, 583 (Minn. 2012) (stating that “[a] motion to withdraw a guilty plea made after sentencing must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief”).
State of Minnesota v. Tuquan Lee Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tuquan Lee Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Whether a plea is valid is a question of law 3 which [appellate courts] review de novo.” (Lussier I) (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stanley Allen Brown, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016