Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eischen Cabinet Co. v. Hildebrandt, 683 N.W.2d 813.

50 citing documents.

Sustainable 9, LLC d/b/a Sustainable 9 Design + Build, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The purpose of a mechanic’s lien “is to reimburse laborers and material providers who improve real estate and are not paid for their services.”
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael Benson Minn. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael Benson Minn. 2024
& n.6 (Minn. 2004) (noting that consistency with the Rules of Civil Procedure, while not binding, provided additional support for our interpretation of a statute).
Jordan Carroll, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dev., and statutory construction
In the Matter of Midway Pro Bowl Relocation Benefits Claim. Minn. 2020
When interpreting statutes, we attempt to “ascertain and effectuate the intentio n of the legislature.” Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (20 18)
Randall v. Paul 897 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Randall v. Paul 897 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(state statute); Citizens for a (federal statute).
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, … 889 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minn. Stat. § 645.16; d 813, 816–18 (Minn. 2004) (where statutory language is silent, consideration of the statute’s purpose and other general legal authorities is relevant to statutory construction analysis).
In the Matter of Temphy Thompson�s Verified Application for Compensation from the Contractor Recovery Fund. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of Temphy Thompson�s Verified Application for Compensation from the Contractor Recovery Fund. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
to pursue the spirit of the law.”
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Anita Jurevica v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
is effective upon mailing, not delivery.” d 813, 818 (Minn. 2004).
State v. Nelson 842 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2014
State v. Nelson 842 N.W.2d 433 Minn. 2014
illehaug appears to support his interpretation by application of the canon of in pari mate-ria, which “ ‘allows two statutes with common purposes and subject matter to be construed together to determine the mean *442 ing of ambiguous statutory language.’” (); , 816 n. 3 (Minn.2004) (describing the canon of in pari materia).
Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co. 820 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Safety Signs, LLC v. Niles-Wiese Construction Co. 820 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 2012
Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. 813 N.W.2d 906 Minn. 2012
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 814 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 2012
supports the conclusion that Minn. R. Civ.
Gallaher v. Titler 812 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Gallaher v. Titler 812 N.W.2d 897 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(noting that construction of statutes is reviewed de novo).
Allen v. Burnet Realty, LLC 801 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2011
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 799 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Eclipse Architectural Group, Inc. v. Lam 799 N.W.2d 632 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
P. 81.01(a) and appendix A (providing that the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure do not govern the procedures in the mechanic’s lien statutes to the extent that “they are inconsistent or in conflict with” the general rules of civil procedure); , 818 n. 6 (Minn.2004).
Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC 790 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2010
Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC 790 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2010
Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 785 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2010
Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLC 785 N.W.2d 753 Minn. 2010
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
at 779-80 ; (stating that the mechanic’s-lien statute “is remedial in nature and its essential purpose is to reimburse laborers and material providers who improve real estate and are not paid for their services”).
In re the Risk Level Determination of J.M.T. 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
In Re Jmt 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
In Re Jmt 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
See Sorenson v. Life Style, Inc., (holding that service by certified mail is effective upon mailing and using the rules of civil procedure as one factor in the court's determination).
In re the Risk Level Determination of J.M.T. 759 N.W.2d 406 Minn. 2009
See Sorenson v. Life Style, Inc., (holding that service by certified mail is effective upon mailing and using the rules of civil procedure as one factor in the court’s determination).
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 759 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc. v. Mensing 759 N.W.2d 229 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, (stating that the mechanic’s-lien statute “is remedial in nature and its essential purpose is to reimburse laborers and material providers who improve real estate and are not paid for their services.”).
Metro Gold, Inc. v. Coin 757 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Metro Gold, Inc. v. Coin 757 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In support of its argument that notice is effective upon mailing
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. 741 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2007
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. 741 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2007
Van Den Bosch v. Weinstock 732 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Van Den Bosch v. Weinstock 732 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
P. 5.02; (holding that, when notice is allowed to be served by mail, it is effective when mailed).
Busch v. Model Corp. 708 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Busch v. Model Corp. 708 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
In Re the Estate of Kotowski 704 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Estate of Kotowski 704 N.W.2d 522 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Hughes 705 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Hughes 705 N.W.2d 195 Minn. Ct. App. 2005