Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Laducer, 676 N.W.2d 693.

22 citing documents.

John Frederick Haugen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In addition, “[a]n admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is sufficient for probable cause to arrest.” d 348, 351 (Minn. App. 1986) (determining that bloodshot and watery eyes, odor of alcohol, and admission to drinking were alone sufficient to establish probable cause for DWI), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Jesse Bruce Jensen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Probable cause to arrest exists [when] the objective facts are such that under the [totality of the] circumstances a person of ordinary care and prudence would entertain an honest and strong suspicion that a crime has been committed.” State v. Laducer , (quotation omitted).
Larry Francis Stevens, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Laducer , -98 (Minn. App. 2004); Minn. Stat. § 629.34, subd.
Otto v. Comm'r Safety 924 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Otto v. Comm'r Safety 924 N.W.2d 658 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Laducer , , 697-98 (Minn. App. 2004).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 693, 697 (Minn. App. 2004).
State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Robert Capers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Robert Capers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-98 (Minn. App. 2004) (“An admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is sufficient for probable cause to arrest.”).
Marsha Katherine Millonig v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Marsha Katherine Millonig v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“An admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is sufficient for probable cause to arrest.”).
Benjamin David Telschow v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Benjamin David Telschow v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is sufficient for probable cause to arrest.”
Quentin Keith Orsten v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Quentin Keith Orsten v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is sufficient for probable cause to arrest.”
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Peter Alan Krech v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is sufficient for probable cause to arrest.”
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (stating that “[a]n officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence”); (“An admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is sufficient for probable cause to arrest.”).
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Mell v. Commissioner of Public Safety 757 N.W.2d 702 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-97 (Minn.App.2004), review denied (Minn. June 15, 2004).
State v. Hussong 739 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Hussong 739 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 2007

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by