Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rukavina v. Pawlenty, 684 N.W.2d 525.

29 citing documents.

Approving the Findings of Fact and Record of Decision for Archer Datacenters Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and Negative … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“[I]mpediments to an organization’s activities and mission” are injuries “sufficient for standing.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
To have standing to seek a declaratory judgment regarding the constitutionality of a statute, “[a] citizen must have sustained or be in immediate danger of sustaining some direct injury from the enforcement of the challenged statute and not suffering in some indefinite way in common with people generally.” Rukavina v. Pawlenty , d 525, 531 (Minn. App. 2004).
Minnesota Alliance for Retired Americans Educational Fund, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A party challenging a statute must have a direct interest that is “different in character from the interest of the citizenry in general.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
at 685 ( rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Free Minnesota Small Business Coalition, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Minn. Const. art. III, § 1; see also Rukavina v. Pawlenty , ( citing article III of the constitution when discuss ing the delegation of legislative power ), review denied (Minn. Oct.
In the Matter of Trade Secret Designations of 2019 Cogeneration and Small Power Production Reports. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In this case, relators assert that they have standing based on their own injuries, 5 a type of standing that this court and others have referred to as “organizational standing.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Midland Funding LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 525, 531 (Minn. App. 2004), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Drummer Development, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Gretchen R. L. Harvey, Gerald Von Grewe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Gretchen R. L. Harvey, Gerald Von Grewe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“Whether a party has standing to sue is a question of law, which we review de 4 novo.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. Swanson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marian v. Swanson v. Terrence K. Swanson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that “[w]hether a party has standing to sue is a question of law”).
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust, 2005-9 v. Maria Twigg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
U. S. Bank National Association, as trustee for the Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust, 2005-9 v. Maria Twigg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYON 784 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
revieio denied (Minn. Oct.
Brayton v. Pawlenty 781 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2010
Brayton v. Pawlenty 781 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 2010
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & Administration 770 N.W.2d 169 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
21, 1999); (holding that return of money to the general fund from a special allotment did not support taxpayer standing), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Olson v. State 742 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Olson v. State 742 N.W.2d 681 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
review denied (Minn. Oct.
West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197 713 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
West St. Paul Federation of Teachers v. Independent School District No. 197 713 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
“Purely legislative power” is the “authority to make a complete law — complete as to the time it shall take effect and as to whom it shall apply — and to determine the expediency of its enactment.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Dunham v. Roer 708 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
See, (mootness); (standing), review denied (Minn. Oct.