Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. DeRosier, 719 N.W.2d 900.

34 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
without the defendant waiving the right to a jury’s determination of that issue.” Reimer, d at 198 ().
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bryan Morgan Holl, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“An error is not harmless if there is any reasonable doubt the result would have been different if the error had not occurred.”
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
d 900, 903 (Minn. 2006) (quoting Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13, 25 (2005)) (emphasis omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“An error is not harmless if there is any reasonable doubt the result would have been different if the error had not occurred.” State v. DeRosier
Gary Lee Burnett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
to urge a different outcome.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
.”); State v. Derosier , WL 1331078, at *2-3 (Minn. App. June 7, 2005) (holding that the district court was not required to instruct the jury that they must agree on which of 11 acts of criminal sexual conduct the defendant had committed against the victim), aff’d on other grounds
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 301-04, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 2536-37 (2004)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“An error is not harmless if there is any reasonable doubt the result would have been different if the error had not occurred.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99, 107, 133 S. Ct. 2151, 2158 (2013); -04 (Minn. 2006) (concluding that the right to a jury trial under Blakely may not be waived by silence).
State v. Washington 908 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2018
State v. Washington 908 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2018
In urging us to reach the opposite conclusion, Washington relies on State v. DeRosier
State of Minnesota v. Eric Tyler Schwappach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eric Tyler Schwappach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Christopher Eugene Wheeler v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Christopher Eugene Wheeler v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Charles Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Charles Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Ty Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mahle Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jason Ty Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. St. John 847 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. St. John 847 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
Rickert v. State 795 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 2011
Rickert argued that ambiguities in *242 his factual basis regarding the date of the offense required the district court to make an implicit finding of fact not established by his guilty plea.