Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Clifton, 701 N.W.2d 793.

58 citing documents.

State v. McArthur 730 N.W.2d 44 Minn. 2007
State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
State v. Mayhorn 720 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
Evidence of a threat made by the defendant against a witness may be relevant to show consciousness of guilt, and to explain a witness’s inconsistent statements, (quoting United States v. Thomas, 86 F.3d 647, 654 (7th Cir.1996)).
State v. Paul 716 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2006
State v. Paul 716 N.W.2d 329 Minn. 2006
We have repeatedly stated that “it is improper to inject race into a closing argument when race is not relevant.”
State v. Jackson 714 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 2006
State v. Vance 714 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 2006
State v. Vance 714 N.W.2d 428 Minn. 2006
Even when relevant, however, evidence regarding threats will be excluded “if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury.” (internal quotation marks omitted).