Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Courtney, 696 N.W.2d 73.

105 citing documents.

State v. Caulfield 722 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2006
(noting that “it is well settled that violations of the Confrontation Clause are subject to such analysis”).
Jihad v. State 714 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 2006
Jihad v. State 714 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 2006
We recently applied harmless error analysis to Crawford error and found such error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt if “the guilty verdict actually rendered was ‘surely unattributable’ to the error.” -80 (Minn.2005) ().
State v. Lasnetski 696 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Lasnetski 696 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
rev’d on other grounds, where we applied Crawford to statements made by an assault victim to a police officer.