Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pederson v. State, 692 N.W.2d 452.
- State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State v. Radke 821 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2012
-
State v. Radke
821 N.W.2d 316
Minn. 2012
(noting the general requirement of showing prejudice under Rule 9.01); (describing prejudice as one of the elements of a successful Brady claim).
- State v. Brown 815 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2012
- State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
-
State v. Jenkins
782 N.W.2d 211
Minn. 2010
-60 (Minn.2005) (citing Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154 , 92 S.Ct.
- Walen v. State 777 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 2010
-
Walen v. State
777 N.W.2d 213
Minn. 2010
(citing Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263, 281-82 , 119 S.Ct.
- State v. Miller 754 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2008
- State v. Miller 754 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2008
- Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
-
Schleicher v. State
718 N.W.2d 440
Minn. 2006
We “review a postconviction court’s determinations of legal issues de novo.”