Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pederson v. State, 692 N.W.2d 452.

63 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Radke 821 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2012
State v. Radke 821 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2012
(noting the general requirement of showing prejudice under Rule 9.01); (describing prejudice as one of the elements of a successful Brady claim).
State v. Brown 815 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2012
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
-60 (Minn.2005) (citing Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154 , 92 S.Ct.
Walen v. State 777 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 2010
Walen v. State 777 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 2010
(citing Strickler v. Greene, 527 U.S. 263, 281-82 , 119 S.Ct.
State v. Miller 754 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2008
State v. Miller 754 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2008
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
We “review a postconviction court’s determinations of legal issues de novo.”