Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. King, 690 N.W.2d 397.

20 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Staleness “must be determined by the circumstances of each case,” and the court’s “approach should be one of flexibility and common sense.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A “delay in executing a search warrant raises two issues: (1) did the delay violate st atutes, and (2) did the delay cause the search to become unconstitutional?” State v. King , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
But there is no “arbitrary time limit[]” or “rigid formula” for determining “whether the probable cause underlying a search warrant has grown stale.” State v. King , review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
a rigid formula” for determining “whether the probable cause underlying a search warrant has grown stale.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
And we “afford the district court’s determination great deference” when reviewing its “probable cause determination made in connection with the issuance of a search warrant.” State v. King , (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But “[t]he passage of time is less significant when the activity is of an ongoing, protracted nature.” review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Cassandra Lee Lundgren Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cassandra Lee Lundgren Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The passage of time is less significant when an activity is of an ongoing, protracted nature.” (citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(quotations and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Albert Hester, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Albert Hester, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(quotations and citations omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Erdmann Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“‘Whether a delay in executing a search warrant is unconstitutional depends on whether the probable cause recited in the affidavit still exists at the time of execution of the warrant—that is, whether it is still likely that the items sought will be found in the place to be searched.’” (quoting Yaritz, d at 16), review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Deshawn Shumpert Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Deshawn Shumpert Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Mar.