Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Dettman, 719 N.W.2d 644.

59 citing documents.

Vickla v. State 793 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2011
A defendant’s admissions, however, may be used to increase the sentence above the presumptive guidelines sentence, provided that the admissions are accompanied by a “knowing waiver of [defendant’s] Sixth Amendment right to a jury determination of facts supporting an upward sentencing departure.”
State v. Wiskow 774 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Wiskow 774 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Verdon 757 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Rodriguez 754 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2008
State v. Rodriguez 754 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 2008
Furthermore, we held in State v. Dettman “that a defendant must expressly, knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to a jury determination of facts supporting an upward sentencing departure before his statements at his guilty-plea hearing may be used to enhance his sentence.” -51 (Minn.2006).
State v. Thompson 720 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2006
State v. Thompson 720 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2006
2006 WL 2290986, at *5 (Minn. 2006).