Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ramey, 721 N.W.2d 294.

1039 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi Farah Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating that an error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct”).
State of Minnesota v. Mohamed Adel Alwan Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Randy Columbus Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Randy Columbus Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2017
For unobjected- to prosecutorial misconduct, this court applies a modified plain-error test; once misconduct that “reaches the level of plain or obvious error” is established, the prosecution bears “the burden of demonstrating that its misconduct did not prejudice the defendant’s substantial rights.” -300 (Minn. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Lilienthal 889 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Adam John Lilienthal 889 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 2017
“An error is ‘plain’ if it was ‘clear’ or ‘obvious,’ ” (citation omitted), which requires that “the error contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct,” d 294, 302 (Minn. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Scott Joseph Arnes Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Scott Joseph Arnes Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ira Dell Sholar Minn. Ct. App. 2017
John Mark Hentges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
John Mark Hentges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Ira Dell Sholar Minn. Ct. App. 2017
An error is plain if it is clear or obvious because it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
Maurice Lovell Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Dana John Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Maurice Lovell Anderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Dana John Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Plain error An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Luke Vernon Kjono Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Luke Vernon Kjono Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kim Ronnie Blatcher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kim Ronnie Blatcher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
An error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
State of Minnesota v. Prince Antonio Dequante Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Elijah Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Williams Wermers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Prince Antonio Dequante Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Elijah Mason Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“An error is plain if it was clear or obvious,” and an error is clear or obvious if the error “contravenes case law, a rule or a standard of conduct.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Williams Wermers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
it is unclear whether the two-tiered approach is controlling.
State of Minnesota v. Abel Gonyamonquah Miamen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Ray Maeyaert Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Ray Maeyaert Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Abel Gonyamonquah Miamen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Susan Patrice Long Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Susan Patrice Long Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Generally, an error is plain if it “contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.”
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2016
Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of Minnesota 886 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2016
“An error is clear or obvious if it ‘contravenes case law, a rule, or a standard of conduct.’ ” ().
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Patrick Rush Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Patrick Rush Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Devon Derrick Parker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Devon Derrick Parker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ian Blair Lindemyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ian Blair Lindemyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Milton, d at 807 (stating that “[a]n error is plain if it is ‛clear’ or ‛obvious’”); (stating that an error is plain if it violates a rule).
State of Minnesota v. Alvin Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Alvin Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 294, 296 (Minn. 2006).
State of Minnesota v. Steven Kobena Ampah Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Kobena Ampah Minn. Ct. App. 2016
8 Unobjected-to statement We review unobjected-to prosecutorial misconduct under a modified plain-error standard, considering whether there is “(1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) affects substantial rights.”
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Ann Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Westley Gordon Vandell Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Vincent Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Under the modified plain-error test there must be “(1) [an] error; (2) that is plain; and (3) the error must affect substantial rights.” (quotation omitted).