Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc., 716 N.W.2d 634.
-
State v. Boehl
726 N.W.2d 831
Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Moreover, were we to adopt Boehl’s suggestion that the plain language of the 2005 amendment to the patterned-sex-offender statute is clear and unambiguous as it relates to Boehl, we conclude that such language could be disregarded because it "utterly confounds [the] clear legislative purpose.” Weston v. McWilliams & As- socs., Inc., (quotation omitted).
- Toth v. Arason 722 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 2006
-
Toth v. Arason
722 N.W.2d 437
Minn. 2006
Inc., (internal quotations omitted).