Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc., 716 N.W.2d 634.

103 citing documents.

American Family Insurance Company a/s/o Nicholas Oelke v. NB Electric, Inc. dba East Side Garage Doors, ... Minn. 2026
“When the district court grants 7 summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Jacquelyn Karre, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
see also Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., (stating that the issue in City of Willmar “was whether the crossclaim for contribution and indemnity could go forward when the underlying action had been barred by the statute of limitations”).
American Family Insurance Company a/s/o Nicholas Oelke v. NB Electric, Inc. dba East Side Garage Doors, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
American Family Insurance Company a/s/o Nicholas Oelke v. NB Electric, Inc. dba East Side Garage Doors, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“When the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a 4 statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that [appellate courts] review de novo.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Daley Farm of Lewiston, L.L.P., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“When the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Richard Preston Blackwell, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
Lorenzo Reed v. Westgate Investments, Inc. 8 N.W.3d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Lorenzo Reed v. Westgate Investments, Inc. 8 N.W.3d 651 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
ability to pursue a remedy and is “intended to eliminate [a] cause of action” after a period of time, regardless of the potential plaintiff’s lack of knowledge of their cause of action and even before the action has accrued, whereas a statute of limitations provides a procedural limit that “typically [is] not triggered until the cause of action has accrued.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., see also Great N. Ins.
Andres Lugo, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., see Minn. Stat. § 541.01 (2022) (“Actions can only be commenced within the periods prescribed in this chapter, after the cause of action accrues.”); (“[A] statute of limitations necessarily deprives a person of an interest which he w
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
Kristina Greene, et al., Minn. 2020
We consider whether an unambiguous statute creates absurd results only in the “exceedingly rare case[s] in which the plain meaning of the statute ‘utterly confounds’ the clear legislative purpose of the statute.” 51 (Minn. 2012) (quoting Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., ).
Timberwall Landscape & Masonry Products, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“When the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
A19-0355 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“When the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” See Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Minn. 2020
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Gust G. Johanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“When the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” See Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
State v. Jones 921 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Jones 921 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
639 (Minn. 2006) ("We can disregard a statute's plain meaning only in rare cases where the plain meaning utterly confounds a clear legislative purpose."
A17-1841 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“We can disregard a statute’s plain mean ing only in rare cases where th e plain meaning utterly confounds a clear legislative purpose.” (quotation omitted)).
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
Great N. Ins. Co. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc. 911 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2018
A16-2034 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
Allan Fishel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Great Northern Insurance Co. v. Honeywell International, Inc. 895 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Great Northern Insurance Co. v. Honeywell International, Inc. 895 N.W.2d 255 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
State of Minnesota v. Kristyn Nicole Schouweiler 887 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kristyn Nicole Schouweiler 887 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 2016
But this canon is *27 not applicable “except in an exceedingly rare case in which the plain meaning of the statute ‘utterly confounds’ the clear legislative purpose of the statute.” (quoting Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., ).
STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of Hennepin 886 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of Hennepin 886 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2016
We interpret a statute according to its purpose rather than its plain meaning only in the “exceedingly rare case in which the plain meaning of the statute ‘utterly confounds’ the clear legislative purpose of the statute.” (quoting Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., ); see Wegener v. Comm’r of Revenue, d 612, 617 (Minn. 1993).
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the Child Of: J.P.-S. and J.D.F., Parents 880 N.W.2d 868 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDaniels 875 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
Wayzata Nissan, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc., Stephen J. McDaniels 875 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 2016
But this canon of construction applies only to ambiguous statutes, except in the “exceedingly rare case in which the plain meaning of the statute ‘utterly confounds’ the clear legislative purpose of the statute.” (quoting Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., ).
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jane Doe 175, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Mother Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School … 873 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David L. Henson as Trustee for the Estate of Maxwell David Henson v. Uptown Drink, LLC, and Third … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Glendalough Homeowners' Association v. Jovani Nassar, and third party v. Evermoor Community Association, third party Community Development, Inc., … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Ruth Unger v. AAA Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ruth Unger v. AAA Insurance Company Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc., d 634, 640 (Minn. 2006).
Jon P. Hanbury, individually and as father and natural guardian of Andrew and Nick Hanbury v. American Family … 865 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jon P. Hanbury, individually and as father and natural guardian of Andrew and Nick Hanbury v. American Family … 865 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When “the district court grants summary judgment based on the application of a statute to undisputed facts, the result is a legal conclusion that we review de novo.” Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, and third party v. Carciofini Company, third party Marvin … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
328 Barry Avenue, LLC v. Nolan Properties Group, LLC, and third party v. Carciofini Company, third party Marvin … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs., Inc.
Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc. v. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.com 859 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeff Persigehl and Samone Bodley, individually and on behalf of the putative classes, (A14-0027), (A14-0123) v. Ridgebrook Investments … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc. v. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.com 859 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.
Jeff Persigehl and Samone Bodley, individually and on behalf of the putative classes, (A14-0027), (A14-0123) v. Ridgebrook Investments … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Inc., (quotation omitted).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A13-2176), GEICO Insurance Company, (A14-0167) v. Metropolitan Council, Lashandra Scott, (A13-2176), Adelfa … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Council 854 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Metropolitan Council 854 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Weston v. McWilliams & Assocs.