Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Chosa Ex Rel. Chosa v. Tagliente, 693 N.W.2d 487.

52 citing documents.

In the Matter of Mia Wilson-Greenwood, on behalf of minor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
claiming that it “reversed a district court that excluded a child’s testimony without findings, explaining that fairness requires every litigant an opportunity to present relevant 9 evidence.” Appellant misreads Chosa, which concerns a child who was 19 months old and a grandmother who sought a
In re the Matter of: Kimberly Rose Wangsness and on Behalf of Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
neither cites nor discusses Minn. Stat. § 609.06 (2020).
In re the Matter of: Gina Ann LaBlanc, and on behalf of Minor Children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
We review the record “in the light most favorable to the district court’s findings,” and we will reverse those findings only if we are left with the “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”
In the Matter of: Katrina Lynn Deantoni, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Matter of: Kimberly Ann Sobiech, and o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kathryn Marie Larson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting that district courts have discretion regarding OFPs).
In the Matter of: Naomi Rae Marx, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(emphasis added) (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. G., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Chosa v. Tagliente , “so we will not reverse absent an abuse of that discretion.” Braend ex rel.
In re the Matter of: Ayano Eto Baylor for self and o/b/o Minor, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Chosa v. Tagliente , (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of: Joanne Lynn Kargel Lund, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Aljubailah ex rel. A. M. J. v. James 903 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Aljubailah ex rel. A. M. J. v. James 903 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(concluding that the district court erred by finding that domestic abuse occurred when the petitioner produced evidence of neither “physical harm nor alleged any intent to do present harm” (quotation omitted)).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chosa v. Tagliente , (“In order to establish domestic abuse, [the petitioner] must show present harm or an intention on the part of the [respondent] to do present harm.” (quotation omitted)); (“[W]e construe the definition of ‘domestic abuse’ under Minnesota’s
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child v. John Patrick Schrimsher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child v. John Patrick Schrimsher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(concluding that district court erred when there was no evidence to support its conclusion that domestic abuse occurred).
In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(concluding that the district court erred when there was no evidence to support its conclusion that domestic abuse occurred).
In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Ashley Elisabeth Boecker o/b/o C. E. L. and M. T. L. v. Correy Michael … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Ashley Elisabeth Boecker o/b/o C. E. L. and M. T. L. v. Correy Michael … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Stanislav Kopylov v. Tatiana Kopylov Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Ashley Rose Henke and o/b/o I.J.S.-H. and M.J.S.-H. v. Kidane Sante Shulbe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Ashley Rose Henke and o/b/o I.J.S.-H. and M.J.S.-H. v. Kidane Sante Shulbe Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Stanislav Kopylov v. Tatiana Kopylov Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Sara Marie Gasper o/b/o A. R. G., A. J. G. and A. L. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Sara Marie Gasper o/b/o A. R. G., A. J. G. and A. L. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Patricia Speece v. Daniel Pinkerton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of: Patricia Speece v. Daniel Pinkerton Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Megan Nicole Arnold v. John Wesley Arnold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Megan Nicole Arnold v. John Wesley Arnold Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. Coons 795 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. Coons 795 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
3 in which this court held that the district court erred by issuing an OFP when the evidence was insufficient to support a finding of domestic abuse.
Pechovnik v. Pechovnik 765 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Pechovnik v. Pechovnik 765 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sperle v. Orth 763 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Sperle v. Orth 763 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Chosa v. *673 Tagliente, ).
Marriage of McIntosh v. McIntosh 740 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of McIntosh v. McIntosh 740 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(citing Mechtel v. Mechtel (Minn.App.
Beardsley v. Garcia 731 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Beardsley v. Garcia 731 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(reversing OFP because district court’s finding of domestic abuse was unsupported by evidence).