Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Taylor v. State, 691 N.W.2d 78.

34 citing documents.

Giovanni German Vasquez Rosales, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But a claim is not Knaffla barred if (1) “a novel legal issue is presented,” or (2) “the interests of justice require review.”
Lannon Lavar Burdunice, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Raymond Joseph Traylor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
However, a claim is not Knaffla-barred, “(1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Mo Savoy Hicks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
There are two exceptions to the Knaffla bar that allow consideration of claims : “(1) if a novel legal issue is pre sented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.” .
Aka Lawrence Fualefeh, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Maurice Lovell Anderson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”1
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Chim LoVan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla [bar]: 5 (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Oji Konata Markham, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting an issue that is Knaffla-barred may be heard in “the interests of justice” if “the petitioner did not deliberately and inexcusably fail to raise the issue on direct appeal”) (quotation omitted).
Earl Anthony Fry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
Thomas Lee Fairbanks v. State of Minnesota 882 N.W.2d 226 Minn. 2016
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.” d 78, 79 (Minn. 2005).
Robert Marlyn Taylor v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 2016
Robert Marlyn Taylor v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 429 Minn. 2016
Taylor v. State (Taylor II)
Brett Thomas Green v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Brett Thomas Green v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Powers v. State 731 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2007
Powers v. State 731 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2007
Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Spears v. State 725 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2006
Spears v. State 725 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2006
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
Lee v. State 717 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 2006
Lee v. State 717 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 2006
Pierson v. State 715 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 2006
Pierson v. State 715 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 2006
“There are two exceptions to the Knaffla rule: (1) if a novel legal issue is presented, or (2) if the interests of justice require review.”
White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
McDonough v. State 707 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 2006
McDonough v. State 707 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 2006
Perry v. State 705 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2005
Perry v. State 705 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2005

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by