Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Disciplinary Action Against Vaught, 693 N.W.2d 886.
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ... Minn. 2023
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against David L. Ludescher, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 194347. ... Minn. 2023
- Original Jurisdiction Minn. 2023
- Original Jurisdiction Per Curiam Minn. 2022
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Minn. 2022
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Bonner 896 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 2017
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Bonner 896 N.W.2d 98 Minn. 2017
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Larry S. SEVERSON, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 99363 860 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 2015
- In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692 850 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 2014
-
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692
850 N.W.2d 699
Minn. 2014
See Rule 13(b), RLPR; (“[U]nder the RLPR and our case law, when an attorney subject to disciplinary proceedings fails to file an answer within the time provided, the allegations set forth in the petition shall be deemed admitted.”).
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Jones 834 N.W.2d 671 Minn. 2013
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Jones
834 N.W.2d 671
Minn. 2013
(disbarring an attorney who misappropriated nearly $50,000 in client funds); (disbarring an attorney who misappropriated $90,000 from elderly clients).
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Glasser 831 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 2013
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Glasser
831 N.W.2d 644
Minn. 2013
The purpose of disciplinary sanctions “is not to punish the attorney, but rather ‘to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.’ ” ().
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Kalla 811 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Kalla 811 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 2012
- In re Disciplinary Action Against Letourneau 792 N.W.2d 444 Minn. 2011
-
In re Disciplinary Action Against Letourneau
792 N.W.2d 444
Minn. 2011
“The purpose of disciplinary sanctions for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney, but rather ‘to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.’ ” ().
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Albrecht 779 N.W.2d 530 Minn. 2010
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Albrecht
779 N.W.2d 530
Minn. 2010
Albrecht argues that the recommended discipline is “unduly harsh.” 8 As we have explained, “[t]he purpose of disciplinary sanctions for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney, but rather ‘to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.’ ” ().
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Plummer 725 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Plummer 725 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2006
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Letourneau 712 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 2006
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Letourneau
712 N.W.2d 183
Minn. 2006
“The purpose of disciplinary sanctions for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney, but rather ‘to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.’ ” ().
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wentzel 711 N.W.2d 516 Minn. 2006
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wentzel
711 N.W.2d 516
Minn. 2006
See, , 891 *521 (Minn.2005); -21 (Minn.1998).
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rudawski 710 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2006
-
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Rudawski
710 N.W.2d 264
Minn. 2006
“The purpose of disciplinary sanctions for professional misconduct is not to punish the attorney, but rather ‘to protect the public, to protect the judicial system, and to deter future misconduct by the disciplined attorney as well as by other attorneys.’ ” ().
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney 709 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2006
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney 709 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2006
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Pierce 706 N.W.2d 749 Minn. 2005
-
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Pierce
706 N.W.2d 749
Minn. 2005
See, (disbarring attorney who misappropriated client funds and who had a prior record of discipline for similar misconduct); (disbarring attorney who misappropriated $15,000 in client funds); (disbarring attorney who misappropria