Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Manthey, 711 N.W.2d 498.

218 citing documents.

State v. Tomassoni 778 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 2010
State v. Tomassoni 778 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 2010
State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
We have said that it is not necessarily “prejudicial for the jury to learn that a defendant is in jail for the crime for which he or she is on trial.”
State v. McCurry 770 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. McCurry 770 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“A mistrial should not be granted unless there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would be different if the event that prompted the motion had not occurred.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Hollins 765 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Hollins 765 N.W.2d 125 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“The plain error standard requires the defendant to show (1) error, (2) that was plain, and (3) that affected the defendant’s substantial rights.”
State v. Tscheu 758 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2008
State v. Tscheu 758 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2008
-83 (Minn.2005) (applying plain error analysis to Confrontation Clause issue); (applying plain error analysis to hearsay question).
Arredondo v. State 754 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
Arredondo v. State 754 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
Hearsay is defined “as an out-of-court statement offered as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” (citing Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Mahkuk 736 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 2007
State v. Mahkuk 736 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 2007
It’s not considered evidence in the trial.” Mahkuk asserts on appeal that Officer Setzer’s reference to firearms denied him a fair trial and that the state “must shoulder full responsibility for Setzer’s improper testimony.” “This court reviews a trial court’s denial of a motion for a mistrial for abuse of discretion.”
State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
State v. Anderson 733 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 2007
State v. Anderson 733 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 2007