Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Deegan v. State, 711 N.W.2d 89.
- Explained Gassler v. State 787 N.W.2d 575 Minn. 2010
- State v. Finnegan 784 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 2010
- Francis v. State 781 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 2010
-
Francis v. State
781 N.W.2d 892
Minn. 2010
“The Minnesota Constitution guarantees the right to counsel'for one review of a criminal conviction, ‘whether by direct appeal or a first review by post-conviction proceeding.’ ” ().
- Barnes v. State 768 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
-
Barnes v. State
768 N.W.2d 359
Minn. 2009
entitles Barnes to representation during his postconviction proceeding.
- Bonga v. State 765 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 2009
-
Bonga v. State
765 N.W.2d 639
Minn. 2009
(holding that a defendant's right to assistance of counsel under the Minnesota Constitution extends to one review of a criminal conviction).
- Morris v. State 765 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 2009
- Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
- Morris v. State 765 N.W.2d 78 Minn. 2009
- Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
- Gustafson v. State 754 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
-
Gustafson v. State
754 N.W.2d 343
Minn. 2008
(construing the Minnesota Constitution); see also Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 , 107 S.Ct.
- Hathaway v. State 741 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2007
- Hathaway v. State 741 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 2007
- Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
- Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
- Spears v. State 725 N.W.2d 696 Minn. 2006
-
Spears v. State
725 N.W.2d 696
Minn. 2006
“Claims decided in the interests of justice require that the claims have substantive merit,” and “that the defendant did not deliberately and inexcusably fail to raise the issue on direct appeal.” (quoting Fox, d at 825 ).
- State v. Losh 721 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 2006
- State v. Losh 721 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 2006
- Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
- Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006