A05-0092
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
KUNFERMAN v. Ford Motor Company
Cited by
- State of Minnesota v. Logan Hunter Vagle Minn. 2025
- State of Minnesota v. Mitchel Jerome Kasper Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- State v. Gayles 915 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Certified Question United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Minn. 2018
- Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 900 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2017
- Minn. 2017
- State v. Guzman 892 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. 887 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 2016
- McCullough and Sons, Inc. v. City of Vadnais Heights, A14-1992 883 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 2016
- David John Anderson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 878 N.W.2d 926 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Mark Jeffrey Koelndorfer v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota 874 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 16, 2004, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). BY THE COURT: /s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice