Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Viker v. Wal-Mart, 695 N.W.2d 97.

109 citing documents.

State v. Griffin 760 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“The right to a speedy trial is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 6 of the Minnesota Constitution.”
State v. Williams 757 N.W.2d 504 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
“The right to a speedy trial is guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 6 of the Minnesota Constitution.”
State v. Miller 754 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 2008
We have stated that the victim’s state of mind must be relevant to be admissible, and “[o]rdinarily, a homicide victim’s state of mind is not relevant to whether the defendant committed the crime.” (emphasis added).
State v. Jones 753 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 2008
803(3), a hearsay statement is admissible if it is a “statement *697 of the declarant’s then existing state of mind.” Admissibility under Rule 803(3) “also turns on weighing probative value against the danger of unfair prejudice.” see Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Ahmed 708 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Swanson 707 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 2006
Spann v. State 704 N.W.2d 486 Minn. 2005
State v. Clifton 701 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2005
State v. Morton 701 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 2005
An error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt only if the verdict rendered was “surely unattributable to the error.”