Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Mauer, 741 N.W.2d 107.
- State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
- Beardsley v. Garcia 753 N.W.2d 735 Minn. 2008
-
Beardsley v. Garcia
753 N.W.2d 735
Minn. 2008
“An ambiguity exists only where a statute’s language is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.”
- Butt v. Schmidt 747 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
- Butt v. Schmidt 747 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
- State v. Engle 743 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2008
-
State v. Engle
743 N.W.2d 592
Minn. 2008
The reckless actor is aware of the risk and disregards it.” Cole, d at 51-52 (alterations in original); -20 (Minn.1983).