Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Wright, 719 N.W.2d 910.

58 citing documents.

State v. Cruz-Ramirez 771 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2009
State v. Cruz-Ramirez 771 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2009
But even if we do consider Cruz’s prosecutorial misconduct claim on the merits, we will only reverse if “the misconduct, when considered in light of the whole trial, impaired the defendant’s right to a fair trial.”
Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
State v. Pendleton 759 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2009
State v. Pendleton 759 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 2009
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
State v. Clark 738 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 2007
“[I]f the prior crime is simply of the same generic type as the charged offense, it ordinarily should be excluded.” -18 (Minn.2006) ().