Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Engle, 743 N.W.2d 592.

37 citing documents.

Ryan Grant, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“[O]ne acts recklessly by creating a substantial and unjustifiable risk that one is aware of and disregards.” (defining reckless for the purpose of statute criminalizing reckless discharge of firearm within municipality).
State of Minnesota v. Ahmed Farah Muhumed Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Ahmed Farah Muhumed Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“Recklessly” is not defined by statute but is generally considered to be “a level of culpability more serious than ordinary negligence and less serious than specific intent to harm.”
State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Otis Redmond Ware Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(holding that a person need not intend the discharge of a firearm to commit reckless discharge of a firearm within a municipality).
Minn. 2022
See State v. Engle , (explaining that the recklessness definition adopted in Zupetz and Mauer “comports with the most common usage of the term”).
State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
See also State v. Engle , , 596 (Minn. 2008) (holding that a remand to district court was necessary where it made a legal error in findings issued following a bench trial).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Amanda M. Doub, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating 8 “the terroristic- threats statute includes more than one mens rea: either the purpose of terrorizing or a reckless disregard of the risk of terrorizing”); d 592, 596 (Minn. 2008) (stating that reckless discharge under Minn. Stat. § 609.66, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Andrew John Wondrasek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Andrew John Wondrasek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
1(a)(1), a person is guilty of a crime if he “recklessly handles or uses a gun or other dangerous weapon or explosive so as to endanger the safety of another.” “[O]ne acts recklessly by creating a substantial and unjustifiable risk that one is aware of and disregards.”
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Davis Holloman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Jamah Griffis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Davis Holloman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael Jamah Griffis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
nesota Statutes section 609.66, subdivision 1a(a)(3), prohibits a person from “recklessly discharg[ing] a firearm within a municipality.” A person acts “recklessly” if he “consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the element of an offense exists or will result from his conduct.” (quotation omitted); (applying the Cole definition of “reckless” to Minnesota Statutes section 609.66, subdivision 1a(a)(3)).
State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr. 856 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Martin David Hutchins, Jr. 856 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that interpretation of the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo).
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
State v. Vang 847 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 2014
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 832 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2013
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 832 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2013
(concluding that remand was necessary where the district court made an error of law in findings issued after a bench trial); -16 (Minn.2007) (holding that remand was necessary where it was unclear that the district court applied the proper legal standard in written f
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 812 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 812 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
Vickla v. State 793 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2011
Vickla v. State 793 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 2011
State v. Wertheimer 781 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2010
State v. Wertheimer 781 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 2010
State v. Peck 773 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 2009
State v. Peck 773 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 2009
State v. Thompson 754 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 2008
State v. Thompson 754 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of N.J.S. 753 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of N.J.S. 753 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 2008