Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Services, Inc., 726 N.W.2d 525.

178 citing documents.

Walter Nachtigall, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subd.
Michael Schemel, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Serv s., Inc., -33 (Minn. App. 2007) (noting that the “ULJ’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and provide the statutorily required reason for her credibility 14 determination”); Skarhus, d at 344 (“[W]e will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.”).
Tina Bell, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Minn. R. 3310.2921 (2017); see also Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Isaac Erickson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Dennis Leinen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g., Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (affirming ULJ’s denial of additional evidentiary hearing).
Clayton Teslow, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subd.
Anthony Browne, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1a (2016); see also Ywswf v. Telep lan Wireless Servs., Inc. , , 531 –32 (Minn. App. 2007).
Ann Christos, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subd.
Robert T. O’Neill, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Edward Wrazidlo, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (concluding that ULJ’s failure to receive relevant evidence was harmless).
Nse Umana, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Lamah v. Doherty Emp’t Grp., (concluding that remand was not necessary when relator did not request an interpreter, and the record as a whole d emonstrated that he understood the proceedings); see also Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (concluding that relator received a fair hearing because she did not request an interpreter and there was no indication that “she did not understand the proceedings, or that the ULJ did not understand her.”).
Sean Roulo, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., -30 (Minn. App. 2007).
Nurieni Abdi, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Th is court will affirm a ULJ’s credibility determination where the witness’s testimony was “very detailed and specific.” Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc. , (M inn.
Jason Gannon, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., -33 (Minn. App. 2007) (discussing factors for ULJ to weigh in assessing cr edibility).
Noelle L. Norris, Relator v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Noelle L. Norris, Relator v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1a(a) (2016) (stating that the ULJ must set forth the reason for crediting or discrediting testimony when credibility “has a significant effect on the outcome of a decision”); see also Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (noting that we defer to the credibility determination made by the ULJ when it is supported by substantial evidence and provides adequate reasons for the determination).
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chrystal Gardner, Relator v. Community Action Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Inc., (holding appellate courts will defer to the ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing).
Chrystal Gardner, Relator v. Community Action Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., d 525, 529 (Minn. App. 2007).
Sharon Hobbs, Relator v. The Polishing Touch, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharon Hobbs, Relator v. The Polishing Touch, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., -32 (Minn. App. 2007) (noting that a credibility determination requires more than a mere recitation of the parties’ testimony); Minn.Stat.
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Deborah Hagen, Relator v. Family Focused Recovery Services, PLLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Deborah Hagen, Relator v. Family Focused Recovery Services, PLLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First, in Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., d 525 (Minn. App. 2007), the ULJ recited with specificity the conflicting testimony of each witness and stated that the relator was not credible and that the employer’s representative was credible.
Debra Barrett, Relator v. Jourdain/Perpich Extended Care Facility, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Debra Barrett, Relator v. Jourdain/Perpich Extended Care Facility, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Rosevelt Beal, Relator v. Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Rosevelt Beal, Relator v. Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (noting that ULJ has discretion to admit or exclude evidence); see also Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (applying harmless-error rule to ULJ’s evidentiary ruling).
Jason Brennan, Relator v. Lubrication Technologies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jason Brennan, Relator v. Lubrication Technologies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
During an unemployment-benefits hearing, “[e]ach party may examine witnesses, cross-examine the other party’s witnesses, and offer and object to exhibits.” Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., (citing Minn. R. 3310.2921 (2005)).
Roger Stoltz, Relator v. SMSC Gaming Enterprises - Mystic Lake Casino, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Roger Stoltz, Relator v. SMSC Gaming Enterprises - Mystic Lake Casino, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., –30 (Minn. App. 2007).
Mohamed Yusuf, Relator v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 880 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohamed Yusuf, Relator v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 880 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Mikel Thorstenson v. Waterford Oil Co., Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Kasele Howard, Relator v. Family First Home Care, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mikel Thorstenson v. Waterford Oil Co., Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We defer to a ULJ’s credibility determinations, Skarhus, d at 344, and will affirm if the ULJ “provide[s] the statutorily required reason for [his] credibility determination,” see Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Kasele Howard, Relator v. Family First Home Care, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., -33 (Minn. App. 2007) (stating that the ULJ’s credibility findings are upheld when they are supported by substantial evidence).
Yer Vue, Relator v. Surdyk's Flights Inc. – Surdyk's Flights Wine Market and Bar, Department of Employment and … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Yer Vue, Relator v. Surdyk's Flights Inc. – Surdyk's Flights Wine Market and Bar, Department of Employment and … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subd.
Michael Rodriguez, Relator v. Arrowhead Economic Opportunity Agency, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Michael Rodriguez, Relator v. Arrowhead Economic Opportunity Agency, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ywsuf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., Miller v. Int’l Express Corp.
Dean M. Haupt, Relator v. Menard, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deborah A. Lindamood, Relator v. Volunteer Services of Carlton County, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deborah A. Lindamood, Relator v. Volunteer Services of Carlton County, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., 532 (Minn. App. 2007); see also Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subd.
Dean M. Haupt, Relator v. Menard, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court will affirm if “[t]he ULJ’s findings are 5 supported by substantial evidence and provide the statutorily required reason for [its] credibility determination.” Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc.
Nikita Seras-Nachole Cordes, Relator v. Heartland Midwest, LLC - Burger King, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nikita Seras-Nachole Cordes, Relator v. Heartland Midwest, LLC - Burger King, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
This court gives deference to a ULJ’s credibility determinations, Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., and will affirm if “[t]he ULJ’s findings are supported by substantial evidence and provide the statutorily required reason for her credibility determination,” Ywswf v. Teleplan Wireless Servs., Inc., -34 (Minn. App. 2007).