Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, 745 N.W.2d 538.

34 citing documents.

Steve Quest v. Nicholas Robert Rekieta Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Steve Quest v. Nicholas Robert Rekieta Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Wayne E. Hukriede, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Jonathan G. Foss, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP , (stating that a nonmoving party must present evidence that is “sufficiently probative” of an essential element of a claim that allows reasonable person to reach different conclusions about the facts in dispute (quotation omitted)); Hopkins by LaFontaine v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins.
Michael Bartell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP , (quotation omitted).
City of Long Prairie, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, (quotation omitted).
Thomas Sullivan, as guardian and conservator for Marc L. Beeman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, d 538, 547 (Minn. 2008).
Morgan-Walg, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Sec. Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 916 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2018
Sec. Bank & Trust Co. v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. 916 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 2018
McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP , , 547 (Minn. 2008).
Ernest Wirtz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney , LLP
Paul Allen Bray, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP , (stating that appellate courts do not weigh the evidence on appeal from summary judgment); DLH, 56 d at 70 (stating that a district court “must not weigh the evidence on a motion for summary judgment”).
James Clarke v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Clarke v. Northwest Respiratory Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Starry Electric, Inc. v. Gilman Cooperative Creamery Association Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Starry Electric, Inc. v. Gilman Cooperative Creamery Association Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Scott Peterson, Roger Smith v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota 878 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Scott Peterson, Roger Smith v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota 878 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, –45 (Minn. 2008).
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Robert Berg a/k/a Rob Berg v. Keith Waters & Associates, Inc., Portico Green, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Berg a/k/a Rob Berg v. Keith Waters & Associates, Inc., Portico Green, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, (“[R]eliance on an implied contract does not relieve a plaintiff from his burden of establishing all essential contractual ingredients.” (quotation omitted)).
Great Southern Bank v. Gustavo Aguilar Guzman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Great Southern Bank v. Gustavo Aguilar Guzman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Timothy Albert Collins v. EMC Insurance Companies Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Timothy Albert Collins v. EMC Insurance Companies Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP
Dahlin v. Kroening 796 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 2011
Dahlin v. Kroening 796 N.W.2d 503 Minn. 2011
*505 Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, -45 (Minn.2008).
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Thomas B. Olson & Associates, P.A. v. Leffert, Jay & Polglaze, P.A. 756 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
investigate arbitrator’s impartiality because of duty to “zealously represent [his] client and resolve all doubts in favor of the client”); -6 (Minn.1981) (holding that attorney who drafted deed conveying real property in joint tenancy did not owe fiduciary duty to surviving tenant who was not client); see also McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, (holding that attorney does not owe fiduciary duty to non-client who is not “direct and intended beneficiary” of attorney-client relatio

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by