Cited by

(declining to interpret the statute so as to "effectively rewrite” it because that prerogative belongs to the legislature rather than the court); ("The policy-based argument advanced by the dissent regarding when to measure the endangerment to the

“ ‘When the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, it is assumed to manifest legislative intent and must be given effect.’ ” (); see also Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive N. Ins.