Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Beardsley v. Garcia, 753 N.W.2d 735.

55 citing documents.

Goodman v. Best Buy, Inc. 777 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2010
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
Laase v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe 776 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 2009
(declining to interpret the statute so as to "effectively rewrite” it because that prerogative belongs to the legislature rather than the court); ("The policy-based argument advanced by the dissent regarding when to measure the endangerment to the
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. 764 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. 764 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
“ ‘When the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, it is assumed to manifest legislative intent and must be given effect.’ ” (); see also Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive N. Ins.