Kurtz Ex Rel. Gillman v. Lakes Medi Van, Inc.
Kurtz Ex Rel. Gillman v. Lakes Medi Van, Inc., 720 N.W.2d 590 (Minn. 2006).
Cited by
Distinguished in 1
- Dorothy L. Henschel v. MJ Business Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Maureen A. Wobig v. Northern Tier Retail, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Aaron Thevenot v. Joseph Companies, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Dakota James Housman v. Menard, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Donald D. Kern v. New Century Systems Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Philljeral Glekiah v. Echosphere, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Dr. Edward Bello v. University of Minnesota, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Jeffrey Zoss v. Collibra, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2025
- Anne L Doering v. 2Care4U South, LLC, 4U Home Health Care South, LLC, Department … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Bryan Boysen v. Independent School District 2172, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Janella Scott v. The Phoenix Residence, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Raymond R. Holman v. Two Bird Dogs, LLC, d/b/a Foxy’s Bar and Grill, Department … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Hoff v. Kempton 317 N.W.2d 361
Opinion text
ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 25, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, “summary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. BY THE COURT: /s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice