Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1.

87 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Application of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The district court concluded that appellant’s partition fence argument failed “as being contrary to the evidence and statute.” “The application of statutes, administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
J. D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
J. D. Donovan, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2015
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Jeffery R. Schultz v. Scott A. Mende, and third party v. City of Madison Lake, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Jeffery R. Schultz v. Scott A. Mende, and third party v. City of Madison Lake, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2014
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian Lee 852 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 2014
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth v. Brian Lee 852 N.W.2d 683 Minn. 2014
Conversely, we have noted that “ ‘different from’ does not mean ‘in conflict with.’ ” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (interpreting a statute providing that a municipality may not require building code provisions that are “ ‘different from any provision of the State Building Code’ ” (quoting Minn. Stat. § 16B.62, subd.
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dean v. City of Winona 843 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., , 13-14 n. 7 (Minn.2008) (recognizing that there are “many permissible areas” for “municipal regulation of rental housing”).
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
In re Application of Skyline Materials, Ltd. 835 N.W.2d 472 Minn. 2013
and City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., the Fields assert that the County has waived this argument.
Northern States Power Co. ex rel. Board of Directors v. Aleckson 819 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Northern States Power Co. ex rel. Board of Directors v. Aleckson 819 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Builders Ass'n v. City of St. Paul 819 N.W.2d 172 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Anderson v. Christopherson 816 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2012
Anderson v. Christopherson 816 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 2012
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
State v. Zais 805 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2011
State v. Zais 805 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2011
See City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
City of Cohasset v. Minnesota Power 798 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 2011
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 806 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 806 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Rohmiller v. Hart 799 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rohmiller v. Hart 799 N.W.2d 612 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
T.E.S. Construction, Inc. v. Chicilo 784 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
T.E.S. Construction, Inc. v. Chicilo 784 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Metro Building Companies v. RAM Buildings, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 204 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
ANALYSIS On review of a grant of summary judgment, we determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (quotation omitted).
Blohm v. Kelly 765 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Blohm v. Kelly 765 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
On review of a grant of summary judgment, we determine “whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court erred in its application of the law.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (quotation omitted).
In Re the On-Sale Liquor License, Class B 763 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the On-Sale Liquor License, Class B 763 N.W.2d 359 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Limited Powers of Municipalities “Generally, ‘municipalities have no inherent powers and possess only such powers as are expressly conferred by statute or implied as necessary in aid of those powers which have been expressly conferred.’ ” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (quoting Mangold Mw.
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Denial of Certification of the Variance Granted to Haslund Ex Rel. City of St. Mary's … 759 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 14.38 , subd.