Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., 749 N.W.2d 1.

87 citing documents.

Dujuan M Walker, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
A25-1221 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
On appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the city, we discussed the application of a three-part preemption test established by the Minnesota Supreme Court in City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., and “conclude[d] that the district court erred as a matter of 20 law in granting summary judgment in favor of the city” because “ the state building code preempt[ed] the city’s policy regulating egress window sizes,” which “function[ed] as a building code regulation” and “dif
Michael Fosness, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Orono Oaks Volunteer Road Association, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The application of statutes, administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Research Action ... Minn. 2025
Fletcher Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants, vs. City of Minneapolis, Respondent, Poverty & Race Research Action ... Minn. 2025
Although home-rule-charter cities have broad power to legislate, “state law may limit the power of a city to act in a particular area.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Richard Whitman, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Sisay N. Beri, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., (“The application of .
Sunrise Estates, a MN Limited Partnership, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Specifically, he argues that the parties’ lease agreement precluded Sunrise Estates from initiating an eviction action until expiration of the ten-day discussion period.1 “The application of statutes, administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Larry Koch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Ingrid Alexander v. City of Minneapolis, and Matrix Development LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2025
We review de novo “[t]he interpretation of an existing ordinance,” RDNT, (quotation omitted), and the application of an ordinance to undisputed facts, City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.
City of St. Cloud, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Id.; see also City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (“The application of statutes, administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.”).
Lillian V. Simmons, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Almir Puce, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
at 75; City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.
City of Waconia, Minn. 2021
See City of Morris v. Sa x Invs., Inc.
Klingelhutz Judgment, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, et al., Minn. 2020
See, e.g., City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., –9 (Minn. 2008) (looking to administrative rules to decide whether the terms of a statute excluded local regulations ); Nw.
In the Matter of Alan Joshua Woggon, D.C. License No. 6076. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(declining to consider an issue not raised below or in appellate brief).
Graco, Inc., Minn. 2020
Cities have “broad power to legislate in regard to municipal affairs [.]” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc. , (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Bruce Clark, et al., Minn. 2019
See Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc., (stating that constitutional questions are reviewed de novo); City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc. , (“The a pplication of statutes, administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.”).
Graco, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 925 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Graco, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 925 N.W.2d 262 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc. , , 6 (Minn. 2008).
A18-0707 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Sheree Rosett Curry, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Larry Wajda, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis , City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc. , A.C.E.
Jody L. Wiza, d/b/a Shack Bar, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gist v. Atlas Staffing, Inc., d 24, 31 (Minn. 2018); City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Peggy Ann Doheny, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Jennissen v. City of Bloomington 913 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 2018
Jennissen v. City of Bloomington 913 N.W.2d 456 Minn. 2018
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc. , , 6 (Minn. 2008) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Kathryn Eich, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Among other powers, statutory cities have the power to enact and enforce ordinances to promote ‘health, safety, order, convenience, and the general welfare.’” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (quoting Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd.
Ouradnik v. Ouradnik 897 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Ouradnik v. Ouradnik 897 N.W.2d 300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (construing state building code); In re PERA Police & Fire Plan Line of Duty Disability Benefits of Brittain
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (“The application of statutes, administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.”).
City of Vadnais Heights, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
City of Mo rris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
In re: Application for an Order for Inspection of David Berglund and Lake View Natural Dairy, 140 County … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re: Application for an Order for Inspection of David Berglund and Lake View Natural Dairy, 140 County … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
5 administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.” City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
Tyler Vasseur v. City of Minneapolis, Ginny Gelms, in her official capacity as Elections Manager, Hennepin County 887 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2016
Tyler Vasseur v. City of Minneapolis, Ginny Gelms, in her official capacity as Elections Manager, Hennepin County 887 N.W.2d 467 Minn. 2016
Louis Park, (stating that the court reviews issues of statutory construction de novo); see also City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (“The application of statutes, administrative regulations, and local ordinances to undisputed facts is a legal conclusion and is reviewed de novo.”).3 Minneapolis is a home-rule charter city.
State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of Business 885 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Minnesota School of Business, Inc. d/b/a Minnesota School of Business 885 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene Wuorenma Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene Wuorenma Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 Nickaboine, d 1, 5 (Minn. 2008).
Builders Association of the Twin Cities v. Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry 872 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Builders Association of the Twin Cities v. Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry 872 N.W.2d 263 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See City of Morris v. Sax Investments, Inc., (noting that the legislature enacted a uniform code because “a single, uniform set of building standards was necessary to lower costs and make housing more affordable”); Builders Ass’n of Minn. v. City of St.
Winhaven Court Apartments v. Sally Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Winhaven Court Apartments v. Sally Carney Minn. Ct. App. 2015
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc., (regulation application); In re Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance, (regulation interpretation).
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
City of Morris v. Sax Invs., Inc.