Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Franks, 765 N.W.2d 68.

114 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Damien Lashaun Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Damien Lashaun Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
–76 (Minn. 2009) (noting that “it is proper to view a defendant’s words and acts in the context of the defendant’s relationship with the victim, including evidence of past crimes against the victim,” reasoning that “[t]he context for this case is one of domestic violence,” and concluding that “the evidence is s
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eric John Henderson-Bey Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellant points out that “terrorize” is defined as “to cause extreme fear by use of violence or threats,” and he maintains that because O.W.
State of Minnesota v. Nikia Kylene Balen. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Nikia Kylene Balen. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Everly Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(defining phrase “feel terrorized” as meaning to “feel extreme fear resulting from violence or threats”).
State v. Ferguson 808 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2012
State v. Ferguson 808 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2012
But the court of appeals reversed and remanded for resen-tencing, required the district court to sentence Ferguson on the drive-by shooting conviction, which was the most serious of the offenses.
State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Patterson 796 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
this court should hold that the most serious offense should be sentenced first in such situations.” Patterson asks this court to adopt a new rule of law under which the most serious offense would be sentenced first, -78 (Minn.2009) (holding that when a defendant’s conduct constitutes more than one criminal offense, Minn.Stat.
State v. Ferguson 786 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Ferguson 786 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
This court affirmed appellant’s convictions, but reversed and remanded for resentencing in light of the supreme court’s