Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Munger v. State, 749 N.W.2d 335.

75 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Patrick Butters Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Robert Patrick Butters Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” d 335, 338 (Minn. 2008) (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Kissner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Kissner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Lori Elaine Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Lori Elaine Christensen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
An adequate factual basis exists if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which [she] desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthoni McMorris-Rice, Appellant./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Steven Anthoni McMorris-Rice, Appellant./li> Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 832 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2013
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
State v. Rausch 799 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Rausch 799 N.W.2d 19 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
(stating that a statute’s several parts will be found to be disjunctive when “signified by the disjunctive conjunction ‘or’ and separated by a comma”).
Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC 790 N.W.2d 167 Minn. 2010
Roby v. State 787 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2010
Roby v. State 787 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2010
Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. 770 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 2009
Jackson v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. 770 N.W.2d 487 Minn. 2009
State v. Netland 762 N.W.2d 202 Minn. 2009
Peterson v. Johnson 755 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Peterson v. Johnson 755 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 2008