Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Munger v. State, 749 N.W.2d 335.
- State of Minnesota v. Roger Lee Voss, III Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
State of Minnesota v. Roger Lee Voss, III
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 871, 878 (Minn. 2024) (“If the [l]egislature unambiguously uses the word ‘or,’ we read the term in the disjunctive and require that only one of the possible factual situations be present in order for the statute to be satisfied.” (quotation omitted)); (stating that provisions are disjunctive when “signified by the disjunctive conjunction ‘or’ and separated by a comma”).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
section 609.344, subdivision 1(c), requires “force or coercion”; the Minnesota Supreme Court has explained, “If the Legislature unambiguously uses the 7 word ‘or,’ we read the term ‘in the disjunctive and require that only one of the possible factual situations be present in order for the statute to be satisfied.’” d 871, 878 (Minn. 2024) () (other citation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
4 The accuracy requirement of a valid guilty plea “protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could properly be convicted of at trial.”
-
Minn. 2024
When the Commission unambiguously uses the word “or,” we read the term “in the disjunctive and require that only one of the possible factual situations be present in order for the statute to be satisfied.” d 871, 878 (Minn. 2024) () (internal quotation marks omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Ayyoob Dawood Abdus-Salam Minn. 2024
-
State of Minnesota v. Ayyoob Dawood Abdus-Salam
Minn. 2024
If the Legislature unambiguously uses the word “or,” we read the term “ ‘in the disjunctive and require that only one of the possible factual situations be present in order for the statute to be satisfied.’ ” ().
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The accuracy requirement protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could properly be convicted of at trial.” Munger v. State , (citation omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Munger v. State , - 38 (Minn. 2008).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A proper factual basis exists if there are “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A proper factual basis exists if there a re “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A proper factual basis “must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the char ge to which he desire s to plead guilty.” Munger v. State , -3 8 (Minn. 2008) (quotation omitted).
-
A20-0547
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The factual basis “must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Munger v. State , (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An adequate factual basis “must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desire s to plead guilty.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the char ge to which he desire s to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that [the] defendant’s conduct falls wi thin the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” 38 (Minn. 2008) (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on th e record to support a conclu sion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Munger v. State , (quotation omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” Munger v. State , -38 (Minn. 2008) (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Milton Joseph Budreau, III, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Jeremy Shane Zimmerman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Jeremy Shane Zimmerman v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
- In the Matter of the Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing and to Submit … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In the Matter of the Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing and to Submit …
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, (advising that statutory language that is not “subdivided or separated” should be read as a whole) (d 335, 338 (Minn. 2008) (stating that under “normal rules of grammatical construction,” a statute’s several parts will be interpreted separately when signified by a disjunctive conjunction or separated by a comma)).
- State of Minnesota v. Titus Triston Miguel Mangun Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Titus Triston Miguel Mangun
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Virginia Marie Carlson
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A proper factual basis requires “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Wolhowe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Wolhowe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Pov Beng Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Pov Beng
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Therefore, “[t]he factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Warren Fred Nelson
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
8 The requirement that a plea be accurate “requires an adequate factual basis” that “establish[es] sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” -38 (Minn. 2008) (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The factual basis must establish sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted).
- Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Crystal Marie Vodinelich v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-38 (Minn. 2008) (stating that the requirement that a plea be accurate “protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could properly be convicted of at trial”).
- Jose Manuel Flores v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Jose Manuel Flores v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- 38 (Minn. 2008) (stating that the requirement that a plea be accurate “protects the defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than he could properly be convicted of at trial”).
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Earl Anthony Fry
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A proper factual basis requires “sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotations omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Javier Rodriguez 863 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Javier Rodriguez 863 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2015