Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lehman, 749 N.W.2d 76.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Scott Mathew Schillak Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Scott Mathew Schillak Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Explained In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: F. F. N. M., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
And this court has held that “[a] criminal defendant forfeits his right to court-appointed counsel when he assaults his court-appointed attorney.” rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The state compares this case to State v. Lehman
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
–85 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Lehman , d 76, 86 (Minn. App. 2008) , 1 The supreme court has questioned whether this two -tiered approach is still good law, while declining to decide the question.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Lehman , , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Lehman , d 76, 85 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Lehman , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Hazley 901 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Hazley 901 N.W.2d 452 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
John Mark Hentges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
John Mark Hentges v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-82 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Maurice Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Maurice Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2016
–85 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Xavier Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Xavier Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
2(b); (recognizing due-process concerns in preventing defendant from wearing alternative clothing), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Doua Chang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Doua Chang Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Quince Raymond Campbell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Quince Raymond Campbell Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Trong Hoang Nguyen Le Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Trong Hoang Nguyen Le Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Although a court may determine that a defendant has forfeited his right to assistance of counsel, the right to counsel may be forfeited only when there is “extremely serious misconduct.” -82 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Krause 817 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 2012
State v. Krause 817 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 2012
State v. Jones 772 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 2009
State v. Jones 772 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 2009
-82 (Minn.App.2008) (noting that the issue of whether the right to counsel can be forfeited was an issue of first impression in Minnesota, and finding forfeiture when a defendant attacked his public defender in open court).