Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lee v. Lee, 775 N.W.2d 631.

190 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of Mary Ellen Block, f/k/a Mary Ellen Jensen v. William Ray Block Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that “the 12 choice of retroactive date is committed to the discretion of the district court, as long as the date chosen is within the statutory limits”).
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Mary Patricia Myhre v. Steven Kenneth Myhre Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
ellant argues now, as she argued in her motion to amend, that the district court’s use of what her investment income could be, instead of what it now is, was contrary to law because she cannot be required to “liquidate her assets” or “invade the principal of [her] investments.” (spouse cannot be required to liquidate assets); n.10 (Minn. 2009) (spouse cannot be required to invade principal).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Donald Knight v. Maria Pieternella Knight Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Holly v. Anderson v. Derrik T. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
S.F. v. Clay County Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Anita Joan Rakow v. Gary Arnold Rakow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
.” see Minn. Stat. § 518.552, subd.
S.F. v. Clay County Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Lynn Desiree Wallace v. Christopher Michael Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Lynn Desiree Wallace v. Christopher Michael Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Beverly Alto v. Kenneth Alto Minn. Ct. App. 2014
−42 (Minn. 2009); see Minn. Stat. § 518.003, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Matter of: Karen Brys n/k/a Karen Warn v. Timothy Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Matter of: Karen Brys n/k/a Karen Warn v. Timothy Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
15 (2012), the appellate courts have previously held that the modification should be retroactive to the date of notice of the motion unless the district court specifies another date supported by factual findings or a statute directs an alternate date, –83 (Minn. App. 2002).
In re the Marriage of: Pamela Kay Beltrand v. Thomas Leo Beltrand Minn. Ct. App. 2014
will only be reversed on appeal if the court abused its [broad] discretion.”
State of Minnesota v. Royce Ryan Teague Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Royce Ryan Teague Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 631, 637 (Minn. 2009).
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Capital Midwest Fund, LP v. Douglas E. Johnson, Steven Quay Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bass v. Equity Residential Holdings, LLC 849 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Bass v. Equity Residential Holdings, LLC 849 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 837 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2013
Marriage of Haefele v. Haefele 837 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2013
Doran v. Independent School District No. 720 831 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Doran v. Independent School District No. 720 831 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
White v. City of Elk River 822 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
White v. City of Elk River 822 N.W.2d 320 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 813 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 813 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Rooney v. Rooney 782 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Rooney v. Rooney 782 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 2010