Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman, 749 N.W.2d 409.
-
1648 Properties, LLC, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minn. Stat. § 481.13 (2022); Dorsey &
-
Gillespie Law Offices, LLP, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Dorsey & Whitney, LLP v. Grossman , and the terms of the fee provision of a retainer agreement set the value of the attorney lien.
-
In re the Marriage of:
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“An attorney’s lien ‘prevent[s] a client from benefiting from an attorney’s services without paying for those services.’” City of Oronoco v. Fitzpatrick Real Estate, LLC , (quoting Dorsey & ).
-
A19-1347
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dorsey & Whitney LLP v. Grossman , d 409, 419-20 (Minn. App. 2008).
- Bay Side Recycling Company LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. Olean 916 N.W.2d 876 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. Olean
916 N.W.2d 876
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
" Dorsey & Whitney LLP, v. Grossman , , 420 (Minn. App. 2008) (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (2006) ).
-
A17-1320
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“When interpreting a statute, we must ‘ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.’” Dorsey & Whitney LLP, v. Grossman , (quoting Minn. Stat. § 645.16 (20 06)).
-
In re the Marriage of: Matthew Durand Dornquast, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“The primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine and enforce the inten t of the contracting parties.” Dorsey &
-
In the Matter of the Appointment of Trustee for the Next of Kin of Kim Marie Caswell (Decedent).
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1(a)(1) (2016); see Dorsey & d 409, 420 (Minn. App. 2008).
- Harper & Peterson, P.L.L.C. v. John W. Seckinger Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Harper & Peterson, P.L.L.C. v. John W. Seckinger
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
.” Dorsey & Whitney, -18 (Minn. App. 2008).
- City of Oronoco v. Fitzpatrick Real Estate, LLC v. Whitney National Bank of New Orleans, Louisiana 883 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 2016
-
City of Oronoco v. Fitzpatrick Real Estate, LLC v. Whitney National Bank of New Orleans, Louisiana
883 N.W.2d 592
Minn. 2016
An attorney’s lien “prevent[s] a client from benefiting from an attorney’s services without paying for those services.” Dorsey & d 409, 420 (Minn. App. 2008).
- Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Wolf, Rohr, Gemberling & Allen, P. A. v. Margots Kapacs Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- James E. Williams v. David L. Stussy Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
James E. Williams v. David L. Stussy
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dorsey & -418 (Minn. App. 2008).
- CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
CSM Equities, LLC v. Woodland Village Investments Limited Partnership
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Courts “will not rewrite, modify, or limit the effect of a contract provision by a strained construction when the contractual 21 provision is clear and unambiguous.” Dorsey & d 409, 418 (Minn. App. 2008).
- Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Soderberg & Vail, LLC v. Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd.
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dorsey & Whitney LLP, v. Grossman, (“[P]ayment in the form of a fixed percentage of .
- Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. Daniel Olean, Dan Kennedy Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Christensen Law Office, PLLC v. Daniel Olean, Dan Kennedy
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The documents and the order pertained to postjudgment 3 DECISION The availability of an attorney lien “traces its origins to common law, but the Minnesota legislature has long since preempted this field and has substituted statutory procedures.” Dorsey & (quotation omitted).
- City of Oronoco v. Fitzpatrick Real Estate, LLC v. Whitney National Bankof New Orleans, Louisiana 869 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
City of Oronoco v. Fitzpatrick Real Estate, LLC v. Whitney National Bankof New Orleans, Louisiana
869 N.W.2d 332
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Dorsey & Whitney LLP, v. Grossman
- Kenneth A. Roseland, Law Offices of Richard E. Bosse, Chartered v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Kenneth A. Roseland, Law Offices of Richard E. Bosse, Chartered v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard …
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
DECISION The attorney lien “traces its origins to common law, but the Minnesota legislature has long since preempted this field and has substituted statutory procedures.” Dorsey & Whitney LLP, v. Grossman, (quotation omitted); see also Schroeder, Siegfried, Ryan & Vidas v. Modern Elec.
- Sheryl Aarnio v. Village Bank, Christensen Law Office, PLLC, third party Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
Sheryl Aarnio v. Village Bank, Christensen Law Office, PLLC, third party
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“When there is an express agreement between an attorney and a client that sets the attorney’s compensation, the amount of the attorney’s lien for legal services is properly determined by reference to the agreement.” Dorsey &
- George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar …
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“An attorney lien traces its origins to common law, but the Minnesota legislature has long since preempted this field and has substituted statutory procedures.” Dorsey & Whitney LLP, v. Grossman, (quotation omitted).
- Effrem v. Effrem 818 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Effrem v. Effrem 818 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Nelson v. Nelson 806 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
Nelson v. Nelson
806 N.W.2d 870
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
See Karl Krahl Excavating Co. v. Goldman, 296 Minn. 324, 327-28 , (“[A] mechanics lien claimant must exhaust his rights against the property by sale before any deficiency judgment may be entered personally against a party personally liable.”); Dorsey & -23 (Minn.App.2008) (concluding that district court has authority to summarily establish an attorney’s lien but not to summarily enforce such lien through a personal judgment against the property owner).
- American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd 773 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
American National Bank of Minnesota v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority for Brainerd
773 N.W.2d 333
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“The construction and effect of an unambiguous contract present questions of law, which we review de novo.” Dorsey & -18 (Minn.App.2008).
- Langerman Law Offices, PA v. Glen Eagles at Princess Resort, LLC 204 P.3d 1101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009