Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Yang, 774 N.W.2d 539.

231 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Cory Cork Ryden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Niles Hubbard Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(citing defendant’s fleeing the scene and failing to render aid to the victim as evidence supporting finding of premeditation).
State of Minnesota v. Cory Cork Ryden Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We review objected-to claims of prosecutorial misconduct under “a two-tiered harmless-error test.”
State of Minnesota v. Maurice Antwan Hegwood Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Maurice Antwan Hegwood Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Bill Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Bill Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An appellant is entitled to a new trial if the errors, when taken cumulatively, had the effect of denying appellant a fair trial.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Jean Crawley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Jean Crawley Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(striking a jury- instruction argument included in a reply brief when the state “did not raise this matter in its [principal] brief”).
State of Minnesota v. Bradley James Richards Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If the claim involves “unusually serious prosecutorial misconduct, there must be certainty beyond a reasonable doubt that misconduct was harmless.”
State of Minnesota v. Peter William Warren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Peter William Warren Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Wayne Regguinti Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We agree that our review “depends on whether an objection was raised at the time of the alleged error.”
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Amir Abd El Malak Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 539, 560 (Minn. 2009) (“An appellant is entitled to a new trial if the errors, when taken cumulatively, had the effect of denying appellant a fair trial.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Overruled State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Saaundre Julian Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Paris Treall Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Javonate James McNeal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyshawn Lanier Darden, Appellant.. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyshawn Lanier Darden, Appellant.. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 539, 563 (Minn. 2009).
State of Minnesota v. Paris Treall Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Javonate James McNeal Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Because the State did not raise this matter in its brief, it was not proper subject matter for appellant’s reply brief and, 7 therefore, is waived and stricken.” n.1 (Minn. 1998) (“Issues not argued in briefs are deemed waived on appeal.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Denzel Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Denzel Cross Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(citing to the rules of civil appellate procedure to support the holding that the reply brief is limited to any new subject matter raised in the respondent’s brief and because it was not raised in the respondent’s brief or the appellant’s principal brief it was waived), State v. Stockwell, 770 N.
State of Minnesota v. Sean David Kilbo Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Sean David Kilbo Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(holding that challenge to accomplice-liability instruction raised for the first time in reply brief was waived).
Royal Jay Toney v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Royal Jay Toney v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
d 539, 552 (Minn. 2009).
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald Ernest Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. President Pimping Austin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Donald Ernest Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“[I]ntent may be inferred from events occurring before D-10 and after the crime.”); (holding that defendant’s fleeing the scene and failing to render aid to the victim were evidence of intent to kill).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Otto Boyum Minn. Ct. App. 2014
A party is entitled to a specific instruction “if evidence exists at trial to support the instruction.”
State of Minnesota v. Eulogio Hernandez-Espinoza Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Eulogio Hernandez-Espinoza Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A., review denied (Minn. Mar.
State of Minnesota v. Darreon Jonye Harding Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Darreon Jonye Harding Minn. Ct. App. 2014